Virtually every two months on our planet crashes passenger airliners, as a result of which people are dying, hundreds of passengers who trusted airlines and simply wanted to fly from one corner globe in another. Of course, in terms of statistics large plane crash It takes extremely rarely, because thousands of flights are performed daily around the world, but, despite this, it is necessary to minimize the threat to passengers, and for this it is important to take into account various circumstances that periodically remind themselves ...
A plane crash "Germanwings". 150 innocent victims.
It is impossible not to pay attention to the last large aircraft crash, an overweight life of 150 people. As specialists stated, the main reason for the fall of the aircraft served the human factor, in particular, it means that the unintended murder of passengers and crew members. According to experts, the action of the second pilot, which, according to some data, locked in the pilot cabin, turned off the automatic piloting system and purposefully expected the aircraft drops.
The pilot was already hurried to blame in insanity, the deliberate murder of one and a half hundred people, and in other sins, however, no one did not pay attention to the fact that the pilot about a year and a half was treated with a psychiatrist. It remains incomprehensible for some reason the reasons for the person standing in insanity, allowed to control the aircraft, and in every possible way they are trying to impose a guilt on him. In addition, the actual evidence that the second pilot is locked in the pilot cabin, since there is no evidence that it is he who turned off the automatic piloting system.
Previously, information also appeared that the aircraft was in a bad technical condition, however, the management of the air carrier denies in every possible way, referring to the fact that they are very competent about this issue. However, it is necessary to take into account the fact that immediately after the plane crash several crews "Germanwings" refused to carry out flights for all the same reasons, and the leadership of the air carrier did not obstruct them, apparently fear of publicity.
Be that as it may, the official conclusion will be given by experts in the near future, but it is unlikely that the final report will be taken into account the actions of the air carrier in the tragedy. The whole of the incompleteness that was demonstrated by the German airline and the recklessness, are unlikely to be able to return the life of 150 people lost for the reasons for ordinary negligence, which is available in each case.
The fall of the TRANSASIA aircraft. 43 Gone gone.
A catastrophe involving the airline Transasia aircraft occurred on February 4, 2015 when attempting to fulfill the flight from Taipei to Jignman Archipelago. On board the aircraft there were 53 passengers and 5 crew members, however, after a while after the takeoff, the aircraft refused one of the engines, and when trying to deploy an aircraft to return to the airport of his departure, an unexpectedly refused the second engine, depriving most of the people Chances of salvation.
The reasons for the refusal of two engines of the aircraft remain unknown, however, it was possible to find out that literally a week before the plane crash, the aircraft was maintained, which could be a key point in finding out all the circumstances. Of course, the cause of everything may also serve as an accident, but given the fact that with a real chance of the aircraft to get into a plane crash is 1 to 100,000, the aircraft of Transasia's aircraft fully exhausted them.
In this case, it is important to pay attention to the fact that again, the prevailing factor is precisely human intervention, and regardless of whether this pilot did, or the equipment serving the aircraft. We often blame all the aircraft that are designed to be the best specialists, but do not properly exploit them, which is in-disabilities, and leads to human deaths that can be avoided.
In the fatal aircraft crash, 43 people died, 13 survived, however, despite the fact that about 2 months have passed since her moment, the true reasons were established and failed.
AIR ASIA liner air crash. 162 Victims of bad weather.
As you know, the end of last year was marked by another very terrible aircraft crash. Air Asia aircraft with 162 people on board performed a flight from Surabaya to Singapore, however, fluttering over the Yavansky Sea, an unexpected way disappeared from the radars of air traffic controllers.
Two days later, the fuselage of the aircraft was discovered by the search group at the Day of the Yavansky Sea and all the people who were on board were dead. Subsequently, it turned out that the aircraft commander in a few moments before the disappearance was noticed by the Aviadpetcher about the intention to change the course and echelon due to the thunderstorm clouds, imagining from the front. For an unknown reason, the air traffic controller refused the flight in a height set, and after another four minutes, the aircraft disappeared with radars, and without submitting a disaster signal.
According to some information, the aircraft could get with the zone of the strongest turbulence or even be affected by lightning, as a result of which all its systems turned out to be disconnected. From this point on, all sorts of versions began to appear that the cause could be unqualified crew actions or even the technical malfunction of the aircraft, however, there was extremely attention to the focus on the aircraft setting in the height aircraft set. It is likely that if the plane rose above the thunderstorm clouds, the consequences of the weather could be eliminated, and this applies to two causes and impact of lightning and turbulence.
If you analyze this catastrophe from the point of view of a special analyzer of the plane crash, then you can see that when trying to pass the aircraft through the thunderstorm clouds, the probability of the incident was 0.000922%, however, in the case of a set of height, it could decrease to 0.000375%, which is 2.5 times less, And it may be quite possible, it might save the lives of people.
Again, very characteristic of all this is the actions of the human factor, and in the face of the air traffic station. Of course, he could use the prescribed instructions, but this does not mean that he realized the situation much better than the pilot.
Of all the above, it can be concluded that if at the moment the improvement of aircraft is paid to much attention, it is necessary to improve the safety of air transportation and among people. It is likely that the total will help if it does not completely eliminate the plane crash, they minimize them as much as possible.
Pray, so that with you, your loved ones, and in general, with all people it never happened.
Plane crash in Boston
October, 1961 year. The plane flying to Philadelphia. Immediately after raising, the Boston Bay collapsed into the air. Cause: Flock of the Skvortsov. There were so many birds that they got into three of the four engines. And died. And with them - 52 passengers of the airliner. Although rescuers quickly arrived at the crash site, almost no one could get alive.
Source: YouTube.com.
One more terrible air crash In Boston
The plane barely scored a height of 400 meters, as she immediately collapsed. All died, including an Angara employee who fell a plane. Cause: Reel. Later, during the investigation, it turned out that the weight of each of the passengers exceeded the permissible rate by 5 kilos.
Source: wikipedia.org.
Plane crash in Kuibyshev
November, 1987. Aeroflot's airline liner flew from Magnitogorsk to Grozny through Kuibyshev. Before landing in Kuibyshev, the senior pilot decided to boast of his skills before the young and inexperienced crew. He said, might, can plant this flying canned apparently, just on the instruments. Hospitally argued with them.
In the end, I reserved all windows with special metal curtains, and let's sit down. The landing went on unacceptably high speed. As a result, the chassis could not stand and lifted. The liner collapsed into two parts. The fire started. 70 people died.
Source: wikipedia.org.
Once in Europe
January, 1997. Flight of Puerto Plata in Frankfurt am Main. Before taking off, the plane passed a thorough check, everything is OK. They climbed into the sky, and immediately bugs began:
- refused autopilot;
- the instruments on the commander panel and on the second pilot panel board showed completely different data.
The crew tried to stick the brains by plane and manually to manage them. Failed. The result: collapsed to the ground, 190 deaths. The study establishes the reason - wasps: insects fibers themselves nest in the device for measuring flight speed and dynamic pressure.
A plane crash in Osparta
Osparta is a city in Western Turkey. October, 1977. Flight from Istanbul to Antalya. The main pilot asked the second pilot to check the situation until he comes to the salon for a moment. The second pilot agreed. As soon as the captain came out of the cab, the second pilot saw in front of him landing strip. Appealed to dispatchers. Those put the plane banned and generally said that there is no landing strip there.
The second pilot-Turk was psychulin, they say, I see with my own eyes that there is, and you tell me here. And began to plant a plane.
The captain was shocked when he returned: the second pilot tried to plant the aircraft on the car highway in the Supart, in 220 km from Antalya. Immediately tried to correct the situation, rushing the steering wheel on myself. The plane fell down, hooked behind the hillock, and collapsed. Nobody survived.
Plane crash in Congo
There are small airplanes serving passenger "transportation" within the country. Most of all in the USA and, as not strange, in Africa. One of the strangest air crash happened in Africa. Namely: 2011, a year, a plane, flight, everything is quietly flying. No one touches anyone. And here the crocodile crashes from the baggage.
The stormy reaction of passengers and led to a plane crash: everyone was broken to the cockpit of the pilots → the airplane nodded the nose forward. Only one person survived, and the same crocodile.
Verdict: In vain at the airports of Africa does not check the luggage before loading on board.
Any aircraft crafts instantly raise the question of the safety of airliners and the threat of terrorism. But so far their causes are not officially established, it is unwise to argue about what could fail. However, there are several reasons for the crash of airliners, which are more likely than others.
1. Pilot error
Over time, aircraft are becoming more reliable, but at the same time the number of accidents caused by the pilot error is growing. Currently it is about 4%. Aircrafts - complex machines, and for their piloting, it is necessary for real skills. Since the pilot actively affects the plane at each stage of the flight, there are many possibilities in order for something that went wrong, from an incorrectly programmed computer to improper estimate of the amount of fuel for lifting.
Sometimes only the pilot is able to save your life
And although such errors are unforgivable, it is important to remember that the pilot may also be your latest hopeWhen the situation becomes catastrophic. For example, in January 2009, the A320 airlobus crashed into a flock of geese over New York. The captain of the vessel had to weigh all the options and act very quickly. Using its extensive flight experience and knowledge in the area of \u200b\u200baircraft manageability, he sent an aircraft to the Hudson River. Thus, the life of 150 people were saved not because of computers or any automated systems. They were saved by two pilots, although many fans of technical progress state that people can be replaced with computers and dispatchers. 
2. Mechanical faults airliner
Equipment failure still leads to 20% losses aircraftDespite improving the quality of production and updating design. Even though, the engines are more reliable than they were half a century ago, they still sometimes create catastrophic situations.
In 1989, the disintegrating fan blade led to the abandonment of the left engine on board the British airliner. The difficulties in reading the indicators of measuring instruments led to the fact that the pilots turned off the right engine instead of the damaged left. Due to the lack of running engines, the plane crashed on take-off stripe The airport, which led to death and injury to many passengers and the captain of the vessel. 
Most recently, one of the airliners of Indonesia also began to tolerate wreck due to engine failure. Only due to the skill of the pilots, he landed safely.
Sometimes new technologies also cause failures. In the 1950s, for example, a new threat appeared for jet aircraft due to the introduction of high flights. Due to overpressure on the body, metal was worn out. After several crashes, some aircraft models were derived from exploiting in anticipation of changes in their designs.
3. Bad weather conditions
Bad weather conditions lead to 10% losses of aircraft. Despite the many electronic means, such as hydroscopic compasses, satellite navigation and availability of weather data, aircraft still fall into storms, snow and fog. In December 2005, one of the aircraft in America tried to land in Purga. He left the runway limits and crashed into a number of standing cars. The little child suffered. 
One of the most famous incidents due to bad weather occurred in 1958, when the British two-door passenger aircraft crashed while trying to take off. The researchers found that the vessel was slowed down by the power of the runway, so it was unable to dial the required speed. Surprisingly, lightning does not pose a threat to airliners, despite the fact that fear of them is quite common in passengers. 
4. Terrorism
About 10% of the losses of the aircraft are caused by sabotage. As in the case of lightning, the risk associated with terrorism is much less than many people got used to thinking. Nevertheless, numerous shocking attacks on airplanes took place. In September 1970, there was a hijack of three passenger jet aircraft in Jordan. It became a turning point in the history of aviation and prompted it better to follow safety. Palestinian liberation hijacked by representatives of the Popular Front, these three planes were blown up in front of the world press. Despite all security improvements, terrorists still can penetrate the aircraft. Fortunately, this happens really very rarely.
5. Other human factors
The remaining losses relate to other types of human errors. They may be allowed by air traffic controllers, dispatchers, loaders, autogasoters or maintenance engineers. Sometimes there is a long shift, and all these people can theoretically allow catastrophic errors.
In 1990, anti-imaging windshield on one of the flights of the British liner was hardly worthwhile to captain the aircraft. According to the branch of the study of the aircraft, almost all 90 windshield mounting bolts were less than the necessary diameter. But instead of answering the discrepancy between bolts and countersunk holes, the maintenance engineer, which is responsible for installing new windshield, woven the blame for oversized meals. In fact, this event was preceded by a sleepless night, and because the engineer was very tired, he could not correctly install the windshield.
Old airplanes are to blame
The date of release of the aircraft becomes the subject of close attention and simple manual, and the authorities after each accident. Most often, the age of the liner is calculated by several decades, and this gives a reason for the obvious one seems to be: "Raised to the sky, she collapsed." The logic is clear: sales managers brings with Arizonian gods, chasing them along the routes in the tail and to the mane, while they are not collapsed. The authorities, in turn, receive a basis for combating old aircraft, most often a particular brand. So, after the accident in Petrozavodsk, on September 19 of this year, Dmitry Medvedev raised the question of removal from the flights of all the aircraft Tu-134, and after the Yaroslavl tragedy, he doubted the flight fate of all Yak-42.
As far as the myth is distributed
Extremely.
What really
Fyodor Borisov, Nether Advisor EPPA Russia:
The first reaction after any aviation accident is usually very painful, sharp, but it, as a rule, has nothing to do with the nature of the event that has occurred. Remember the old army expression: now I'll figure it out, as follows, and I will punish, who got? So, after the plane crash, everything is usually the opposite, they punish whom it fell, and then disassemble. And this is very bad, because it leads us away from the search for a real problem.
The first false trail, which usually goes, is old planes. He is false, because old planes do not happen. There is no such definition in nature. For example, I flew not so long ago in Holland on the 1931 development plane and 1943 of production. Yes, it, of course, was repaired many times, the mass of everything was changed inside, but I wonderfully flew on it, and he is not old. The plane, released and 50, and 70 years ago, itself is safe if it meets the requirements flight security. If you have all the nodes are certified if you follow its condition, then the problem of the old aircraft is not safety, but exclusively its economic efficiency: how profitable to exploit it is profitable.
Vasily Savinov, partner of STRATEGIC AVIATION SOLUTIONS INT. (SASI):
I would have given such an example for a simple alignment. We have a lot of car-three-year-old cars surrounded from abroad. And if you look absolute statistics, then the number of accidents in Russia is stronger than in the same Western Europe. But it's not because we have a three-year car, and they have new ones - they traveled to them and gave us so that we are crashed. This is more from driving culture, road states.
Similar situation in aviation. If an imported aircraft is 10, 15, 20 years old is not an indication that it is in poor condition. A simple example. China buys exclusively new aircraft. Five years later, they start to get rid of these cars, but no one takes them. Because the fresh car in five years of operation Chinese can come into such a state that it is exploited unprofitable to continue: they will spend more for repair than earning. At the same time, we now take for our project in one of the CIS countries the car of the 85th year of release. It is in excellent condition, because TNT was operated, and they have one minute of departure delay already considered to be late for which the analysis takes place. Accordingly, you can imagine the state of this car - it works better than the Kalashnikov machine. Here is the difference between the car age of 5 years and 25 years. It all depends only on those hands that supported it.
Alexey, pilot one of the leading russian airlines:
From the point of view of the pilot, there is absolutely no difference how old the plane is that the year is that ten, that twenty. In any case, the pilot itself takes the final decision, to fly or not. Because he just like passengers, wants to return home to his wife and children and in no case will not fly with some serious malfunction.
There are, let's say, the manufacturer officially authorized by the manufacturer with which the departure is possible. But if the commander does not feel confident that he is tenant with this malfunction, he will not fly. For example, autopilot. Imagine: You are driven by car, you have refused cruise control. This is problem? In general, no. But from the point of view of the pilot, if you fly long, far away, and manually piloting is an additional burden on the crew, the commander may simply refuse.
Yes, old aircraft have such faults more often, but the solution always remains behind the pilot.
Output
Fedor Borisov:
It is necessary to proceed from the fact that aircraft are not divided into Western and not Western, good and bad, old and new, but on ready-to-reach departure and not ready. Everything else is a matter of an exclusively economy of airlines.
Compliance of the myth of reality
Does not match.
Myth 2.
Bad Pilots are to blame
Investigations of almost every airfather are found among the causes and human factor. At best, this is the tired of the crew from loads, in the worst - alcohol, as it was with a plane crash in Perm in September 2008. Trust in person behind the steering wheel in the passengers has been falling lately. Famous arguments: The system of preparing pilots is bad, new good pilots are not taught, and old good things go to foreign companies, and the worst remains on regional airlines.
As far as the myth is distributed
What really
Competition and desire to learn
Paul, pilot instructor:
Only a citizen of Russia can be a member of the flight crew in the Russian airline. This provision remained since the USSR, and its conservation has already been predicted by the Russian trade union of pilots. But there are more and more aircraft in the country, and the pilots do not have time. There was a time, ten years, when people simply did not go to aviation, and at the same time the trained pilots went, say, in business. There are a lot of such. Now young people are enough, but they also come out very green, no, they need to learn a lot.
And many graduates of institutes come in the airline without an aspiration for self-education. At the same time, salaries are huge, disproportionately large. Even a young pilot receives a lot now, and at the same time he does not need to fight for his place. The lack of personnel is that in any case, if you drive out of one company, take another.
On the one hand, this is good, because it is pointless to put on the pilot, so that he flew with some kind of malfunction, because he will not be dismissal than him - how to dismiss a person if you have a list "Required" hangs, and there are pilots, pilots, pilots, and there. And will you dismiss the person you run and you are looking for?
On the other hand, such a position of pilots relaxes. If Russian airlines were allowed to recruit foreign pilots, as was done in very many countries of the world, it would make it possible to remove many problems, including security. In addition, it would be easier to master the new generation of aircraft.
The level of education
Paul, pilot instructor:
Training should be adequate and modern. Well, why a person who is produced from the School is to know the energy of Tu-154 B2, which are already the units? Why amazed learning these numbers if he goes to Boeing 747?
People sit in the institutes in sixty. And not because they are such good teachers, but because they have nowhere to go. And there are no young teachers.
A lot of "old school masters" and among pilots. If you look closely, it can be seen that some of our large airlines "Boeing" take off in Tupolevski, slowly slowly. Because there is sitting the commander who says: "There was a Tu-154 - it means that we will also take off here, and everything." Because he is fifty, why should he follow the books, follow the technologies? And the young second pilot sits on the right and he will not re-with him. We do not know how to listen. If you politely said to someone: "I wouldn't pay attention to this problem," you will look at and say: "So what is there for an attachment of a young one?
Sit and silence. "
If such a "master" is starting to learn a new one, he will send you, because well, he is a master. People negatively perceive the message that someone can know something better than them. Although this is the norm. And this master is able to perceive new. We have not formed this culture.
About alcohol
Vasily Savinov:
Recall the catastrophe in Perm. As mentioned in the conclusion of Mac, the aircraft commander was "not in the formation of a flight", and the qualification of the second pilot did not allow it to piloting the aircraft. As a result, when the commander, being "not in the flight form", tried to take on the aircraft control, he simply turned him over, introduced himself in a peak and stuck in the ground.
But I can say that now it is relative rarity. In comparison with Soviet times, the drunkenness behind the steering wheel was clearly descended. Because in the Soviet years, control over the alcohol on board was significantly less.
In addition, alcohol is perhaps the only one, for which today you can fly from work with the go. At least in the responsible company alcohol is the door to the exit. And the market is close. All know everyone. Therefore, as soon as a person with such a diagnosis flies out of the company, it's like a wolf ticket for a lifetime.
About avos.
Fedor Borisov:
Almost every catastrophe that occurred in Russia in last years- This is a human factor, and almost every thing is where mentally or out loud was uttered.
But this problem is not aviation, but in general, the country that lives according to the principle "I want the law to be respected, but for myself is always ready to make an exception." So some pilots: I have a rule, I know that it is dangerous, but I still have a web. Not because it is necessary for me a bad manager, which will deprive me, but simply because I need to go home, because my wife's house. And I am a master, and since I am a master means, I will handle this task, because I have taken time at this time in such a situation, and everything is fine. And in the eleventh time, a small additional factor was added, which no one expected - and that's it.
This person is sitting in the head, and you will not do anything with this Avosa until this person says to his second pilot: "Sorry, father-commander, I am now going to the authorities and report that I will not have a web because you want me to kill me and here these beautiful people behind our back want to kill. And what you do is unacceptable. " And when he will not be afraid to hear in response, "Ah, you, young stukach", when he is not alone, and when there are two, ten, ten, fifty people, then it will become a system.
Although positive changes began, and it happened, in my opinion, when airlines that either fly to the West, either enter into global alliances, simply understood that the change in this culture corresponds to their goals. The same "Aeroflot" began to move in this direction not yesterday, and when it was planned to join SkyTeam.
Output
Vasily Savinov:
The reason for the disaster of interest at seventy-eighty is one way or another the human factor. People who revealed on maybe. That is, not old airplanes and individual parts, is the main and main reason to be eliminated.
Moreover, the human factor is not necessarily the crew. This is a long chain. For example, the same blatant case with Perm. The commander was, to put it mildly, not in shape. But, besides, there were violations when teaching pilots: after studying for some time some time flew on their old aircraft, and not immediately moved to new ones. And lost a new flight skill. That is, people were not very ready to fly on this plane. Secondly, the plane was released with defects, which in principle were unbearable: he had a different thrust of engines. That's all together and there is a human factor, and not just "Captain
I got drunk and killed everyone. "
Compliance of the myth of reality
Corresponds to a large extent.
Myth 3.
Old airports are to blame
The problems of infrastructure remember when accidents occur in provincial airports. Experts agree: at the present level, only Moscow airports plus are still equipped with
Three four in the country. When, for example, a plane fell in Petrozavodsk, it turned out that at the local airport there is no modern planting system. In turn, most of the old Soviet and Russian aircraft are not equipped with modern systems alerts about rapprochement from the ground. And the bad runways at the same time do not allow new aircraft.
As far as the myth is distributed
What really
Vasily Savinov:
The bad runways is a greater degree of airlines, which are forced to put the chassis more in the repair, more often change the tires. But the disaster from this does not happen. Just the airline makes a decision: at this airport we fly, and this is not flying to this. For example, Aeroflot does not fly to Norilsk. Although, believe me, this flight is very economically beneficial. But at some point the airline decided not to fly: the chassis will come out more expensive. There is a bad strip, it is known for its very big humpback and a biety. Nothing with her does not, and carriers vote with legs. So they voted.
Light, navigation equipment is also not the most important thing. I can give an example. I was about one and a half years old was one of the top managers of Karaganda airport. This is the airport category "B". In Kazakhstan, there are much better equipped airports - Alma-Ata, Astana. There both equipment, and radars - everything is there. But weather conditions are always worse there. Therefore, when the weather is bad, all superclass planes go to the landing in Karaganda, where the equipment is worse, but with meteo conditions is better.
Output
Alexey, Pilot:
It is necessary to watch this question. Of course, it is good to have a good infrastructure, to have a third band. But it does not affect the safety of flights.
Compliance of the myth of reality
Does not match.
Myth 4.
Levitin is to blame
The question of the resignation of Igor Levitin from the post of Minister of Transport rises after each aircraft crash. As well as the question of the competence of all officials managers, controlling aviation, did not build, did not control themselves. As civil Aviation There is not in a vacuum, and we are all permeated with corruption, then it is also explained by the fact that planes fall from us: because someone paid and put that the part that needs. And how to determine how many personal responsibility in the plane crash, and how many collective?
As far as the myth is distributed
What really
Vasily Savinov:
The current state of aviation is not the problem of one person. If you change the main traffic cop in Moscow, did you stop the car to fight? Of course not. Maybe something will change, maybe somewhere there, in a separate place, will become a little better expensive. But in general, the situation will not change dramatically. Now at the same Levitin in the Ministry of Transport there is no team, there is no concept that would show what should be russian aviation Five years later, in ten years, that is, a clear understanding where we go, what we need to change.
Yes, there are plans to build up the country with new runways. But this is not a concept. This is a story about how regional budgets receive big money, and then they are mastering them. But it has nothing to do with security.
Fedor Borisov:
Safety is made up of three components. The first is regulatory documents that regulate security. And in principle, in Russia, regulatory documents are normal. Something can be corrected, probably, but they do not contain anything that would have programmed the murder of their own citizens.
The second is effective control. That is, this is the most official who will come and check the execution of this document. And here we have some complexity. Because there is a basic law: people go to violation when they allow them to go on violations. For example, when it was said that small companies should leave the market, because they are unsafe, it actually signed the state in its insolvency as a market regulator. Because it raises hands and says: "Guys, we can not control, because there, apparently, corruption, and therefore they violate the law." But it is a little ridiculous. Because, guys, you yourself are regulating this market. And now you say: "We will close them, because we do not cope with the regulation." Or, translating into Russian: "We take bribes, and therefore we close them, because they do not take bribes, sorry, we can not."
And the third is the culture of airlines. With this we have progress, but Rosaviatsiya and the Ministry of Transportation does not have any relations at all. Progress is achieved at the expense of large companies, and their global alliances led to this, where they need to join to win in world markets.
Vasily Savinov:
In addition to the safety of flights, aviation authorities have another important task - to help their country's airlines to develop the market, help people develop their business. But they can't do it. Because in their understanding business is kickbacks. Here, let's say, Airlines "A" you allowed to fly to Antalya, and the airline "B" did not allow, and the grateful airline "A" told you a lot Thank you. That they know how to do wonderful. But what to do in order for Russian airlines to be good to develop so that they can compete with foreign carriers and expand their market share, which is few of the aviation authorities. But this should be part of national politics.
Output
Fedor Borisov:
Airplanes are not falling due to Levitin. It is only one of the elements of the common chain. What is Levitina's fault as the minister is that when you fly on airplanes, you pay twice as much. If you fly in Europe, then surely surprise: why a ticket from Munich in Rome is twice as cheaper than a ticket from Moscow to Krasnodar? The first thought that comes to your mind - bastards in airlines. But the study of all the costs of airlines, the market structure, as it forms, will convince you that, of course, the airline also takes an active part in this system, but the aviation authorities contribute a significant contribution. It is they who provide small monopolies at different aviation directions, where people will progress all the transportation and dictate prices.
FROMopportunity of myth reality
Partially corresponds.
Myth 5.
To blame for "leopards"
Small airlines take on the main blow to almost after each accident. After Petrozavodsk and Yaroslavl, on behalf of the President, Rosaviatsiya and the Ministry of Transport, prepare documents, which from the next year they will be supplanted from the market of those air carriers who will not be ten, and another year - twenty aircraft.
As far as the myth is distributed
What really
About buying new aircraft
Vasily Savinov:
The decision to buy new aircraft should not be imposed on top, it must be the decision of the airline itself. You can not force me to buy "McLaren" - I have enough of my "Saaba", it corresponds to my budget, my wishes and a driving manner. And if I have been told: "By decree of the president, you must sell everything and buy" McLaren "for a million," - I say: "Guys, sorry, I can not,
I don't physically ".
The biggest problem is most of our regional airlines (except "UTair") is that these are companies of two or three to four small aircraft. They are hard even even these aircraft maintain in due state. Therefore, when they say: tomorrow you have to buy a new Boeing, which costs 120 million (or even 10 million), - How do they take them? They will not give a loan to them: they have nothing to put in pledge.
And if they find money on a plane, they need to spend half a million dollars to retraining one crew.
Regional transportation
Vasily Savinov:
Small airlines kill easily, in five minutes - just take and withdraw the testimony or not to prolong the certificate of flight fitness by the plane. Yes, from the point of view of aviation authorities, a woman with WHO - mare is easier. But what then will all local will fly in a taiga?
Fedor Borisov:
There are places where the railway communication is not in principle. Or, like on Baikal, there are points to which the plane will do in two hours, and the train ride six days. And while the airline flies there, which has five an-24 in the park, and their total cost - 2-3 million dollars, no more. Accordingly, it is to buy one foreign car, you need to sell all your own and something else.
Therefore, if we prohibit An-24 and Yak-42, it will have the most unpleasant consequences. Really, it will be the collapse of the regional art. Because to replace them with some. Large companies, firstly, will not come to these routes, because they lack airplanes and pilots even on cost-effective flights, - Why do they divert resources for almost planned unprofitable? The same "Aeroflot" will only go to this in one case - if he is called from the place where other aircraft will be banned, and they will say: it is necessary to plug in the hole.
But what does it mean to "stall a hole"? Regional transportation, most likely, will have to subsidize. So, from somewhere you need to get a huge amount of money. And we kind of standing in front of the new crisis, we say that the budget must be slaughtered in all positions. But the money will still get money, because the people in the villages or in the towns will crawl with posters on the square and say: we were cut off from a large land.
Then Saveliev (the head of Aeroflot. - "RR") will call, ask: "Can you?" And then the second stage. He will find money on subsidies, and he will say: "And I have no aircraft that can fly there. I have a "Superjet", but he will not sit there, because only the Turbopranscript An-24 can take there. " Where do you take an-24? And nowhere - all, they are canned, and the airlines are dissolved.
In addition to the version of the subsidies there is an option to run a monopolist and give it the opportunity to set prices yourself. What will be, I will explain on the example. Murmansk and Apatity are two neighbor airports. Four airlines fly to Murmansk - I don't know how now, but last year the most cheap Ticket One end cost 3 thousand rubles. Moscow - Apatity is one carrier, "Nordavia". And the ticket there is 20 thousand one way. Moreover, apatites are 100 kilometers closer to Moscow.
Therefore, if small airlines eliminate, we will have three things. Some routes will uniquely close. On others, fly less often - not every day, but one or twice a week. Well, the third is, of course, the growth of tariffs. Because small regional airlines contribute a huge contribution to the price conjuncture, these "thumbnails" are quite flying and create competition.
Output
Fedor Borisov:
Yes, of course, we are talking about the fact that large airlines quality service is better, security control, maybe more reliable. But the problem with the quality of service is not treated with amputation, like scoring on the leg.
Here we want to integrate into the global economy, and in Moscow, every second speaks in English, because the city lives in business, here you need to know English. And in the villages in English no one says, because there is a problem with teachers. So let them eat languages \u200b\u200ball there and we will remove this problem - they will have a valid reason not to go in English. The second decision is to send teachers there. I mean that we must teach these small regional airlines. Yes, it is difficult how difficult it is to take a village guy and make an university graduate from it. It is more difficult than to take a Muscovite who studied in a special school, but it still needs to be done.
Compliance of the myth of reality
Does not match.
Today, air travel acquired such popularity that aircraft in terms of use frequency for tourists were equal to cars and trains. However, traveling in the air seems to many very dangerous and not quite reliable. Is it true how our ideas about the danger of air flights correlate with statistics and how often airplanes fall?
Selection of transport for travel
In the period of long-awaited holidays and long holidays, many face the problem of choice for fabric travel on hot beaches or snowy ski resorts. And it is complicated, for you need to correlate many factors, such as the convenience of movement, the price tag on the journey itself and, most important, security. Let's consider statistical studies and find out how often airplanes fall and whether the scale of this is really so fatal, as it seems to people.
Trains are safer - error or not?
According to statistical research, the most safe view Moving people are the train. Slightly above the route at the train. The locations in the world in the world of confidence do not at all cause. In their full reliability believe only sixteen percent of respondents. If you take into account cars, their safety rating is generally low, for they are initially considered very attendant for moving over long distances.
However, in the struggle between various types of transport on the criterion of reliability, everything is not so simple. The aircraft according to many years of research on aircraft crash and statistical studies are recognized on the right that no less people, even despite the official scientific confirmation, do not even experience confidence in them. Why is this happening? Maybe the news about what the plane fell somewhere, very much tourists frighten? Let's deal with the situation.
Is the plane not safe?!
Statistics Although accurate science, but the final result is very dependent on the calculation method. When determining the level of safety of aircraft, the number of tragic events for the total number of flight kilometers is taken. It is this type of calculation that the stars are mainly used, and it is its results that are published in official sources.
The whole secret lies in the fact that the catastrophe in their most comes on the moments of takeoffs and landing. In the way the crash of the aircraft occurs much less. But this method of calculation is very profitable for transport companies, and they very often enjoy them, so as not to defeat the desires of tourists to choose for traveling by air travel. Nevertheless, such an indicator, as those who died in a plane crash (their number), with accidents on take-off and landing, acquires a very big scale.
If we take into account the calculation of tragic cases on the total mileage of movement, then two types of movements will be the most dangerous - motorcycle and walking on foot. It is only worth viewing a summary of the tragic moments in any city and you can see that pedestrians die a lot, even more than motorcyclists.
If you explore the remaining methods of statistical research, then the aircraft will give way to the train. For example, by the number of passengers' death on the number of trips and the speed of movement of airfares are the most unfavorable.
When considering other research methods, it turns out that the trains are best to choose. So the tourists are not good for the news from one news that the plane fell, and the trip by railway The right has a security advantage in the minds of people.
The rating of the safest airlines
Whatever it is, it will still have to fly, because there are such resorts, where in any other way of transport you just do not get there, but I really want. Despite the bad forecasts, negative reviews and dark views, our country is still not the weakest flight safety. But the United States has a rather long period of time ranks leading positions on the fall of aircraft. If you build a rating for countries - owners of aircraft, then we can say that in the number of the first five part of Finland, New Zealand, Hong Kong and UAE. It is the companies that this top is worth flying, and then no accident will be scary. Russia in this ranking is on a sixteenth place with Transaero.
Causes of falling aircraft
Why do airplanes fall? Tourists primarily before choosing the airline give preference to firms with the most "young" on the deadlines of the modes of transport. Nevertheless, this is not fully confirmed by statistical data. According to them, in Russia, the company with the most disturbed transport park is "Aeroflot". The use of its aircraft is less than five years. However, Finland, which occupies a leading position on the safety of flights and a small number of advantages, has a period of operation of their cars for more than nine years.
This fact indicates that the crash of the aircraft from the worniness and service life is unlikely. Having chosen the airline by the criterion of the small transport, the likelihood of the fall does not decrease at all. If you turn to the statistics, you can see that more aircraft crash is due to the human factor, and it does not go anywhere.
How to overcome your fear of flights, because there are situations when traveling by plane is simply not avoided. Psychologists on this score give delivel tips. If the fear is caused by any disorders in the psyche, be it panic attacks or fear of a small closed space, then you need to solve these problems.
Nevertheless, in many cases, the fear is caused by the lack of complete personal control over the situation and safety of the flight. It is necessary to take as inevitable, because from us any movement on transport depends little. Therefore, it is recommended at the airfare to simply relax and distract from bad thoughts on watching a movie in the tablet or listening to pleasant music. In no case do not use alcohol as removal of stress. It's really a nervous state if it squeezes, it is very short, and then the problem is only aggravated. Fear of flights need to be solved first of all with itself. There is no need to simply flutten your nerves, taking into account the information of the news channels on how often aircraft fall, and you just need to calm down and try to take your emotions under control.
What aircraft happen more often disasters?
If you contact worldwide statistics, you can recognize "Boeing" in the most unreliable, the second of the number of falls is "an", in third place is located "IL". If you turn to Russian research, you can see that the most "falling" in our country will be "an". Why do airplanes fall? For the only 2005 year in Russia, the collapse of the whole nine cars of this brand. In the world, they account for nineteen percent of all disasters.
The reasons for aircraft in Russia are explained by journalists in one vein - an outdated transport park of domestic companies. Is it really and how often do airplanes fall for this reason?
Causes of Falls of Russian Airplanes
In general, the aging of air transport is expressed not in the number of years after its production, but in the sum of the rated hours and the general technical condition. According to statistics, Russia has airplanes still Soviet times and their percentage is much higher than foreign production aggregates. However, you should not look at age. Compared to foreign vessels, domestic fluttered much less hours, and the Soviet quality of production was one of the best in the world.
For what reason then Russia acquires overseas aircraft for considerable money when there is a completely reliable car? As an example, you can bring the aircraft "TU". They have excellent flight safety statistics, and pilots consider them most convenient to the technical device.
One of the reasons is the fact that the "TU" aircraft are very consumable in the number of fuel consumed. And since airfares have long been turned into a separate type of business, director of companies in pursuit of a reduction in the cost of servicing the park of their cars give preference to foreign liners, which are significantly saving Russian analogues.
Another reason is the fascinating aircraft. The technologies of their release are significantly outdated, the investments in air facilities are not performed. Therefore, our country cannot compete with more advanced foreign units.
How to save the situation?
In Russia, in order to stabilize the situation with the aircraft manufacturing market, the president was signed by a decree on the establishment of the United Aircraft Corporation. Moreover, investments in aircraft manufacturers in the amount of ten billion dollars were planned. It was in a distant 2006. Currently, the situation has not improved at all. The process of education of the corporation very much slowed down and, if you believe the journalists, the purpose of its creation was not a study of the competitor market, but to unite all the assets of Russian airlines in one place.
Nevertheless there are positive movements. Company "Ilyushin Finance" acquired airplanes from Russia "IL" and "TU". The Tashkent Production Association concluded an agreement with the St. Petersburg airline for the supply of Russia "IL", most of which will be Russian configuration.
What you need to know about the airfare?
From the fall of the aircraft, no one is insured. However, if you have the necessary information about what happens when the aircraft falls, there is a chance to survive when crashing. In the nineties, an accident with a liner "B-707" occurred. Died in a plane crash counted hundreds of people. Nevertheless, five passengers took advantage of the information from the stewardess instructions and survived.
In some cases there is a chance to escape if you have the necessary knowledge. They are not so useless, as it seems at first glance. Knowing what happens when a plane falls, you can apply a lot of effective methods for your own security.
As the main ways to protect yourself, how we show the statistics of the plane crash, is the observance of precautions. First of all, it is necessary, if possible, stay in shoes and clothing. It will be a fire protection. It should be removed from the pockets of clothing all foreign objects and tightly fasten the seat belt. It is allowed to remove it only after the special team of the stewardess.
Immediately before the accident, if there is such an opportunity, it is necessary to take a protective pose - you need to get started as low as possible and very hard to force your hands under the knees. The head should be put on them, and if it is impossible to do, then omit it as much as possible. Legs should be left as close as possible to the floor. This technique, and fully proves the statistics of the plane crash, often saves the life of passengers when crashing the aircraft.
Finally
As you can see, it's not a terrible thing to fly. The main thing is to use tickets only by time-tested by time and small number of crash airlines, as well as to comply with the security requirements for passengers of aircraft, so that the experts do not have to study the falling aircraft on which you flew to relax in the warm country. Safe flights and successful landings with takeoffs!
