The Boeing-777 crash killed two Chinese women, most of the almost three hundred passengers were Chinese citizens. Several people were taken to hospitals in critical condition.

The reasons for the crash of one of the most modern and reliable aircraft in the world are still unclear: only the version of a terrorist attack has been completely ruled out. The rest can be judged after analyzing the data from the flight recorders, they have already been discovered and sent for decoding to Washington. NTV correspondent Alexei Veselovsky transmits from the USA.

After a 10-hour flight from Seoul, the Boeing-777 was not even minutes, seconds before landing at the San Francisco airport, when something went wrong. While descending onto the runway, the liner hits the airport's concrete fence with its tail and immediately bursts into flames.

From the impact, the plane turned around and dragged several hundred meters along the ground at speed. An amateur video taken immediately after the crash shows how people are being rescued from a burning liner along inflatable ladders. The Boeing had 291 passengers and 16 crew members on board. They say that there were no problems during the flight, but the plane behaved strangely before landing.

Passenger: "The plane went up, then down, and then it seemed to collapse and hit the ground."

Numerous eyewitnesses of the crash also say they saw the plane come in for landing at an unnatural angle, with its nose up.

He hit the runway with his tail and then there was an explosion. The tail broke off. The chassis and the plane on the belly were dragged and twisted on the ground. As a result of the crash and They were thrown out of the plane at speed after the tail fell off.

About 180 more people with burns and fractures were taken to hospitals. Six are still in critical condition. What happened to the airliner during landing, no one knows yet, although investigators immediately dismissed the version of a terrorist attack on board. From the air it is clearly visible that the cockpit remained intact, but the upper part of the fuselage was almost completely burned out, the interior was burned out, and a huge hole gaped in place of the tail.

The wreckage of the plane was scattered for tens of meters across the field. Judging by the audio conversations of the dispatchers at the airport, one of them noticed that Flight 214 was landing strangely. First there is a cry: "What is he doing?" Then on a raised note: "Go to the second round." But obviously it was too late. The next exchange took place in a second - this is a request from one of the pilots for help and a message that rescuers and fire brigades left for the burning plane.

It is known that during landing at the San Francisco airport, it was turned off. When deviating from the landing trajectory, it gives corrective signals to the pilots.

The twin-engine Boeing-777 is one of the most popular long-range airliners in the world and one of the most reliable. More than a thousand of them have been produced in various versions. And only 6 technical incidents were recorded. The last and visually similar one occurred in 2008. Then, at London Heathrow, a British Airways Boeing made a hard landing. Passengers escaped with minor injuries. Nobody died. And the cause of the crash was called the stop of the engines during landing ice crystals accumulated in them.
Boeing said it would provide all necessary documentation to investigators on the plane. And those, in turn, intend to take a closer look at the South Korean carrier Asiana.

DUSHANBE, March 9 - Sputnik. Five years ago, a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing disappeared from radar. There were 239 people on board.

All were declared dead, but neither the remains nor the liner itself were found. About how the search operation went and why it did not produce results - in the material RIA Novosti.

Shrouded in mystery

Malaysia Airlines Boeing-777 took off from Kuala Lumpur Airport on March 8, 2014 at 00:41 local time (20:41 Moscow time on March 7).

He was due to land in Beijing in six hours. There were 239 people on board, including 12 crew members. Mostly Chinese, Malaysian and Taiwanese.

Nothing foreshadowed trouble. Ten days before the flight, the plane was fully checked. stood good weather. Everything was calm on board: the crew did not send alarm messages. 40 minutes after takeoff, the liner disappeared from the radar.

Subsequently, it turned out that everything was done with a delay.

For some reason, Ho Chi Minh air traffic controllers reported that the plane did not enter their airspace until 20 minutes after it disappeared from radar, and not within two minutes, as required by the regulations. Malaysia Airlines itself reacted belatedly, declaring an emergency five hours after the last contact with the crew.

As a result, the rescue operation was launched only ten hours after the loss of the airliner. Representatives of 26 states, whose passengers were on board, hastily sent military and fishing vessels and helicopters to the search operation.

Tried everything. They tried to determine the location of the aircraft even from the signals of smartphones belonging to passengers, but to no avail.

Soon, oil slicks were discovered off the coast of Vietnam, and after a while, debris. Oddly enough, all this had nothing to do with the missing plane.

The scope of the search operation expanded, but did not bring results. Rescuers combed the sea and land for days on end. There were no clues, more and more unexpected versions of what happened were put forward.

One of the main ones is an explosion on board. This explained the absence of noticeable debris.

But other questions arose: why did not a single satellite detect the explosion? The possibility of hijacking the liner was not discounted either.

So, it turned out that two passengers got on board with stolen passports. Italian Luigi Maraldi and Austrian Christian Kotzel had their documents stolen in Thailand in 2012-2013.

But this, too, was not connected with the catastrophe - according to the documents of the Europeans, two Iranians flew, hoping to settle in the European Union.

What has been achieved during this time

The operation to search for flight MH370 has already been called the largest in the history of aviation.

In total, over $150 million was spent on it. In five years, six fragments of the liner's hull were discovered.

The first was found by a scavenger in July 2015 on the island of Reunion, four thousand kilometers from the alleged crash site. According to him, he also came across suitcases and a chair similar to an aviation one, but he burned it all, "like all the garbage." And the scavenger didn't hear anything about the missing plane because he doesn't watch TV.

A couple more fragments were found on the coast of Mozambique, Mauritius and on the beach in South Africa. The authorities admitted that these were indeed fragments of the missing aircraft.

Relatives of the dead passengers repeatedly complained about the international investigation team and tried to organize their own search. We launched a campaign on a crowdfunding site to raise five million dollars.

However, they collected a little more than 100 thousand dollars, and this was only enough for several months of the investigation, which, however, also led to nothing.

What's with the pilot

But there is evidence that "an unlawful interference was committed, as a result of which the communication systems stopped working and the aircraft was manually deployed."

The liner was operated by the aircraft commander, 53-year-old Malaysian Zachary Ahmad Shah, who flew 18.5 thousand hours, and 27-year-old co-pilot Farik Ab Namid, for whom this flight was a test.

Various accusations were made against Zachary. Former Canadian head of the Transportation Safety Bureau, Larry Vance, suggested that the first pilot committed suicide and killed the rest of the passengers and crew along with him.

Australian experts hypothesized that the ship's commander was trying to confuse air traffic controllers. Say, for this, he turned off the detection systems and flew the plane on the border of the zones of responsibility of Thailand and Malaysia, which is considered a blind zone. And near the Malaysian state, he completely made an unnecessary detour, as if saying goodbye to the house in which he was born. No one has officially confirmed this information.

According to Sergey Melnichenko, General Director of the ICAA Flight Safety, a member of the World Flight Safety Fund (FSF), the pilots were not found guilty - there are no sufficient grounds.

But the crew commander is a really curious person. With his own hands, he assembled a special simulator, on which he trained to fly an aircraft in the basement of the house. The route set in the simulator coincided with flight MH370.

Zachary's call sign was "Twin Towers 777".

"Many knew him as a person who can be relied upon, who will give good advice in a difficult life situation. Interestingly, he supported the opposition in Malaysia. A year before the disappearance of the plane there were elections, the opposition lost. There is a photo of him on the Internet, which says "June 13 - the end of democracy." He had a distant relative - one of the leaders of the opposition," the expert says.

“But the most interesting thing we found is that the Muslim Zachary became an atheist. For Muslims, this is a more serious step than for Christians. There is too much mystery in the personality of the commander of this ship,” Melnichenko admits.

And he adds that shortly before the flight, Zachary handed over a large sum of money to his daughter, who lives in Australia. In the coming years, he was going to retire and may have planned to build a house somewhere nearby.

Indian schoolgirls pray for missing Malaysia Airlines flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing
According to the expert, there are too many inconsistencies in the investigation.

“Back in 2017, the Malaysian government was supposed to be given two new fragments found, which are at the disposal of the government of Madagascar. They were going to be presented by the honorary consul of Malaysia in Madagascar. As soon as this became known, the consul was killed. It is not clear whether this is connected with the disappearance of the aircraft. And the wreckage is still in Madagascar. Isn't Malaysia very interested in them?" Melnichenko is surprised.

The Director General of the ICAA "Safety of Flights" also drew attention to the fact that the flight plan and the final report indicate different alternate aerodromes for this flight in China.

The disappearance of the airliner with 239 passengers and crew members on board remains unsolved, sums up Melnichenko. Although the investigation lasted five years, the experts could not answer two main questions: what and where happened to the plane.

1. General description of the situation

The Boeing 777 of Malaysia Airlines (Amsterdam - Kuala Lumpur) took off from Amsterdam Schiphol Airport at 10:14 UTC (14:14 Moscow time) on 07/17/2014 and was supposed to arrive at its destination at 06:10 local time (22:10 UTC/2:10 MSK).
The flight was carried out by a third replacement crew. According to the British newspaper Daily Mail, the two crews switched shifts to avoid flying over the war zone. Pilots expressed concerns about the risky route.
At 16:15 Kyiv time (14:15 GMT), Ukrainian air traffic controllers first lost contact with him, and then at 16:20 Kyiv time (14:20 GMT) he disappeared from the radar of the Dnepropetrovsk regional control center altogether. At 16:45 Kyiv time (14:45 GMT), an aircraft emergency beacon signal was detected three kilometers northwest of the village of Grabovo, Shakhtyorsky district, Donetsk region, which is located 78 km from Donetsk and about 50 km from the border with Russia . Subsequently, the remains of the aircraft were found burning on the ground in Ukraine. The plane crashed near the village of Grabovo (near the town of Torez). None of the passengers and crew members survived.

2. The need for a situational analysis

The need for this type of analysis is caused by the need to identify external and internal factors that caused the death of the Boeing 777, as well as to determine the circle of people involved in this situation and the parties interested in extracting any benefit from this event. As well as determining the circle of persons legally responsible for this event.

3. The concept of the situation and situational analysis

A situation is a combination of internal and external factors, circumstances, conditions, active and passive acting forces and material resources.

Situational analysis allows, based on a deeper understanding of the situation and the dynamics of its development, to develop and make more informed conclusions, as well as to anticipate the possible occurrence of crisis situations and take timely measures to prevent them.

4. Analytical group

In order to conduct a situational analysis, the Russian Union of Engineers created an analytical group led by Ivan Andrievsky - a team of highly qualified specialists capable of conducting an examination in the process of situational analysis.
The analytical group included:
Level 1 experts are highly qualified specialists with professional knowledge and experience in one of the areas or problems that are directly related to the object of the situational analysis.
level 2 experts are highly qualified specialists who are able to analyze and assess the situation as a whole.
technologist - a specialist with the necessary professional knowledge and experience in organizing and conducting a situational analysis.
analyst - a specialist with both the necessary professional knowledge and experience in analyzing situations in this area, and experience in supporting situational analysis, preparing analytical reports and conclusions.

The final work was first of all shown to the President of the Center for International Geopolitical Analysis - Colonel-General of the Reserve, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Leonid Grigoryevich Ivashov and received his positive assessment, then it was finalized and presented to the public.

5. Initial data for conducting a situational analysis

In order to conduct a situational analysis, the experts of the Russian Union of Engineers took into account the following initial data:
Conclusions from the engineering and technical analysis of the reasons for the death of the Boeing 777 carried out earlier by RSI experts;
Grade airspace, in the area where the death of the Boeing 777 occurred;
Assessment of military infrastructure in the area of ​​the Boeing 777 crash;
Assessment of the mechanism for making managerial decisions that resulted in the destruction of a civilian aircraft and the command and control structure in the zone of the anti-terrorist operation (ATO) by the authorities of Ukraine;
Assessment of the state of the military-political situation in the area of ​​the crash of the Boeing 777 on the eve and after the crash;
Evaluation of the coverage of the Boeing 777 death by officials and the media (speeches by the leaders of European countries, as well as the United States and Malaysia);
The progress of the investigation into the causes of the crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777;
Preliminary results of the investigation of the Dutch Safety Board dated 09.09.2014;
Conclusions of other experts.

5.1. Conclusions from the engineering and technical analysis of the reasons for the death of the Boeing 777 carried out earlier by RSI experts

According to analysts of the Russian Union of Engineers, the death of the Boeing 777 occurred as a result of its complex destruction both by the missile armament of a combat aircraft, using a close-range air-to-air missile, and by cannon armament using a 30-mm aircraft gun or an SPPU-22 container with double-barreled 23-mm gun GSh-23L. At the same time, when firing at a target, a laser rangefinder or a laser sight could be used, which can significantly increase the accuracy of shooting. The nature of the damage and the spread of fragments indicate the use of two types: on the wreckage of the Boeing there are rounded holes, which are usually obtained as a result of cannon shots, and explosive holes, characteristic of missiles with arrow-shaped submunitions (for example, R-27).

5.2. Assessment of the territory and airspace in the area where the death of the Boeing 777 occurred

The territory of the Donetsk region of Ukraine, in the area of ​​the crash of the Boeing 777 (to the north-west of the village of Grabovo in the Shakhtyorsky district of the Donetsk region, which is located 78 km from Donetsk and about 50 km from the border with Russia) on 07/17/2014 was under the control of the militia of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic (DPR). At the same time, only the earth was under control, but not the air.
On this territory, hostilities were conducted between the Armed Forces of Ukraine, battalions of the National Guard of Ukraine and volunteer battalions on the one hand, and detachments of the DPR militia on the other hand.
The fighting was carried out, including with the use of heavy weapons by government troops and formations of Ukraine.
A few days before the crash, according to statements by the Ukrainian authorities, other incidents with aircraft occurred in the conflict zone: on July 14, an An-26 was shot down in the Luhansk region at an altitude of 6.5 kilometers; on July 16, a Su-25 and another Su- 25 was fired from MANPADS. In total, in June-July 2014, more than ten manned aircraft were reported lost in the area. aircraft Air Force of Ukraine.

On July 8, 2014, Kiev closed the airspace in the war zone with the following wording: “In order to ensure the proper level of flight safety, the airspace over the territory of the ATO [Anti-Terrorist Operation] is closed for any flights of civil aircraft in the interests of state aviation. The corresponding ban was issued by the State Aviation Service.
Ukrainian authorities closed the airspace over the conflict zone for flights civil aviation from 1 July to 7,900 meters (26,000 ft), and from 14 July to 9,800 meters (32,000 ft). The International Air Transport Association (IATA) stated that, according to its data, there were no restrictions on flights in the space followed by the Malaysian liner, and the European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation indicates that the space on the route of the liner was closed by the Ukrainian authorities until flight level 320, and flights were cleared at flight level 330 (33,000 feet) at which the aircraft was flying. According to the airline's press release, MH17's flight plan was to use 35,000 feet for the entire route through Ukrainian airspace, but Ukrainian air traffic controllers instructed it to use 33,000 feet.
By the time the Malaysian Boeing 777 disappeared from the radar screens, British Airways, all American airlines, Lufthansa, Air France and the Australian Quantas had already added an additional 20 minutes to their routes to bypass the danger zone in southeastern Ukraine.

At the time of the death of the Boeing 777, there were three civilian aircraft operating in the airspace of Ukraine, performing regular flights:
Flight from Copenhagen to Singapore at 17:17;
Flight from Paris to Taipei at 17:24;
Flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.

In addition, Russian air traffic control systems recorded a climb by a Ukrainian Air Force aircraft, presumably a Su-25, in the direction of a Malaysian Boeing 777. The removal of the Su-25 aircraft from the Boeing 777 was from 3 to 5 km.

On Fig. 1 shows the international route along which the Boeing 777 was supposed to fly. It can be seen that in Poland the aircraft followed the corridor established earlier for these flights, and then deviated from the course.

Rice. 1 – Boeing 777 flight path

On 07/18/2014, a senior representative of the European dispatch service Eurocontrol, Brian Flynn, said that due to the air crash, about 350 flights a day, including 150 international ones, would be changed due to the ban on civil aviation flights over the territory of eastern Ukraine.

As stated in the preliminary report submitted by the Dutch side on 09/09/2014, “... the aircraft arbitrarily deviated from the course. At 12:53 (UTC or 15.53 local time) the liner flew under the control of the Dnipropetrovsk checkpoint air traffic, in control sector 2 at FL330. At this point, the controller asks the aircraft if they can climb to FL350 to avoid interfering with another Boeing 777 that was flying behind. The board replies that it will not be able to take 350 and asks for a further flight on 330. The dispatcher agrees, and in order to avoid dangerous encounters, he sends another liner to 350 echelon. At 13:00, the crew of MH17 requests permission to deviate twenty nautical miles to port due to weather. Dispatcher allows. After that, the aircraft asks if flight level 340 is available, the controller temporarily rejects the request, indicating to remain at 330 for the time being. At 13:19:53 (according to radar data), the aircraft was 3.6 nautical miles from the center line of route L980. That is, the plane deviated from the course. The controller directs the aircraft to set a direct course to the RND waypoint due to other traffic. The ship's crew acknowledges receipt of instructions at 13:19:56. This was the last thing the controller heard from the crew. After 4 seconds, at 13:20:00, the controller sends a traffic control clearance to the board after the RND waypoint, immediately proceed to the TIKNA waypoint, but does not receive a response ”(according to the Expert magazine).

According to the experts of the analytical group, one of the circumstances that aroused increased interest in media coverage of the death of the Boeing 777 was its deviation from the usual route to the north and the flight over the territory controlled by the forces of the DPR militia. And also the fact that in relation to the reasons for this deviation, different positions were expressed that contradict each other.

5.3. Assessment of military infrastructure in the area of ​​the death of the Boeing 777

The military group involved in the ATO in the east of Ukraine consisted of units of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine (Armed Forces and Territorial Defense), the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (militia and National Guard units), the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine and the State Guard Department of Ukraine. According to a statement by Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, as of August 2014, the group had reached a strength of 50,000 people.

Forces and means of ground air defense forces

According to the data provided by the Chief of the Main Operational Directorate - Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, Lieutenant General Andrey Kartapolov, at a special briefing of the Russian Ministry of Defense on the crash of MH17 flight in the sky of Ukraine, held on July 21, 2014, "on the day of the crash of the Malaysian Boeing-777" group air defense of the armed forces of Ukraine near the city of Donetsk consisted of three to four anti-aircraft missile divisions of the Buk-M1 complex. […] in the morning of the same day, a Buk battery was discovered near the village of Zaroshchinskoye, 50 km east of Donetsk and 8 km south of Shakhtersk.”

Representatives of the Russian Ministry of Defense also reported that on the day of the death of the Malaysian Boeing, they recorded the operation of several radar stations of the Ukrainian battery of the Buk-M1 air defense system, and then the subsequent redeployment of the Buk battery from the area of ​​​​the Zaroshchenskoye point closer to Donetsk.

At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that the militias do not and did not have their own aircraft and there is no military need to form an air defense system in this area. Moreover, in the absence Money in the ATO, just moving such a large amount of equipment without giving it any task is pointless. The second aspect of this issue is that only a very high military leadership can move several air defense systems across the territory of Ukraine.

According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, by July 17, the intensity of the work of the Ukrainian radar stations 9S18 "Kupol-M1" of the Buk anti-aircraft complex increased to the maximum.

Fig. 2 - Ukrainian radar activity statistics
in the area of ​​the death of the Malaysian Boeing 777

The Russian military recorded the operation of the Kupol radar of the Ukrainian battery of the Buk-M1 air defense system on the day of the death of the Malaysian Boeing 777.
From the presented graph, it follows that on July 15, 7 stations were operating, on July 16 - 8, and on July 17 there were already 9 of them. From July 18, the intensity of the operation of the radar station sharply decreased and amounted to 2-3 stations per day.

Two questions arise:

1. To resolve what situation and solve what tasks were the air defense systems deployed to this point?

2. Why exactly at this time and precisely at this hour did the activity of the radar stations that make up the air defense system increased, what were they looking for in the sky?

Aerodrome network

On fig. 3 presents information about the most probable airfields based on combat aircraft in Ukraine, where pre-flight preparation could be carried out, a combat sortie and return of the aircraft could be provided.

1. Boryspil airbase - 15 transport brigade An-30, Mi-8, An-26, Tu-134.
2. Airbase Vasilkov (UKKV) - Kiev region, 40 fighter brigade, MiG-29, L-39.
3. Airbase Vinnitsa Gavryshevka (UKWW) - Vinnitsa region, 456 transport brigade, An-26, An-24, Mi-8, Mi-9.
4. Zhulyany airbase - airport.
5. Airbase Zaporizhia - Il-76, An-12, Mi-8.
6. Airbase Kaydaki (Dnepropetrovsk) - airport.
7. Airbase Kirovskoe - flight test center of the Air Force of Ukraine.
8. Kulbakino airbase - 299th assault brigade SU-25, L-39, Su-24 - 33rd training center for flight personnel.
9. Air base Melitopol - Zaporozhye region, 25th transport air brigade Il-76, Il-78.
10. Airbase Mirgorod - Poltava region, Su-27, 831 tactical aviation brigade (IATA code MXR, ICAO code UKBM).
11. Airbase Nezhin - An-32, Mi-8, Ministry of Emergency Situations of Ukraine (until 1998 199 ODRAP Tu-22R).
12. Ozernoye Air Base - based 9 mixed IS MiG-29, Su-27.
13. Airbase Starokonstantinov - Khmelnitsky region, Su-24M, Su-24MR.
14. Airbase Chernobaevka - Kherson region, Mi-24, Mi-8.
15. Air base Chuguev - Kharkiv region (KhVVAUL), 203 training air brigade, L-39, An-26, An-26Sh, Mi-8.

Rice. 3 - Airfield network in the area of ​​the death of the Malaysian Boeing 777

As follows from Fig. 4, most of the operating airfields are within the radius of combat use, for example, such aircraft as the MiG-29, Su-25 or L-39 or the like.

Rice. 4 - The radius of the combat use of aviation

Combat radius
Su-25 1250 km
MiG-29 700 km

Forces of the militia of the DPR in the area of ​​the death of the Boeing 777

As of July 17, 2014, the area of ​​Shakhtyorsk, over which the Boeing 777 crashed, was under the control of the self-defense forces of the self-proclaimed Donetsk people's republic. The armed forces of the DPR at that time were equipped with light weapons, artillery systems, tanks and armored personnel carriers, the exact number of which has not been established. From anti-aircraft missile weapons there were MANPADS "Igla". As the Minister of Defense of the Lugansk People's Republic Igor Plotnitsky reported on 07.07.2014, representatives of the LPR people's militia seized a military aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force. It was about the Su-25 attack aircraft, which is currently undergoing repairs and will soon be able to serve the militias of the republic. There were no other reports about this aircraft and the possibility of its combat use. There was also no information about the presence, and even more so about the use of aviation by the forces of the DPR.

They did not find confirmation of the message of the Ukrainian side about the presence of the militia forces of the Buk-M1 air defense system capable of destroying air targets in the range of altitudes and speeds similar to the Boeing 777.

Even the Ukrainian authorities themselves refused accusations that the Boeing 777 could allegedly be shot down by the air defense system captured by the militia in Avdiivka.

In the first hours after the disaster, the adviser to the Minister of Internal Affairs, Anton Gerashchenko, stated that the authorities recorded the presence of a Buk installation in the militias, which moved "in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe cities of Torez and Snezhnoye." However, on the same evening, a source in the leadership of the anti-terrorist operation said that the rebels in the south-east of Ukraine did not have weapons capable of shooting down a plane at an altitude of more than 10 km.

According to the experts of the analytical group, the death of the Boeing 777 as a result of the use of aviation weapons could only follow from the armed forces of the party to the conflict, which has combat aircraft, an airfield technical network and navigation equipment, as well as trained aviation and ground personnel. It should be noted that the forces of the DPR did not possess either one or the other, or the third.

5.4. Assessment of the mechanism for making managerial military-political decisions that led to the destruction of a civilian aircraft and the command and control structure in the zone of the Antiterrorist Operation (ATO) by the authorities of Ukraine (according to theinsider.ua)

In accordance with the Law of Ukraine dated May 31, 2005 No. 2600-IV (with amendments and additions) “On the fight against terrorism”, the fight against terrorism is based, in particular, on the principle of unity of command in the management of forces and means that are involved in anti-terrorist operations.

The head of the ATO, according to the law of Ukraine "On the fight against terrorism", is the first deputy head of the SBU, who is also the head of the Anti-Terrorist Center of the special services.

It is under his command that all units of other law enforcement agencies that have units to combat terrorists are transferred - these are the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the State Border Service, the Ministry of Defense, the State Guard Department, as well as authorized persons of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other central authorities, who are delegated to the headquarters to coordinate efforts Antiterror.

Information about the activities of the ATO headquarters, which is carried out in Donbas, is classified as a state secret. Any interest on the part of journalists or the public in the leadership of the ATO causes an extremely painful reaction from the representatives of the ATO and the competent authorities.

Segregation of duties

According to the Law "On Combating Terrorism", the key role in the fight against terrorism is assigned to the SBU. In addition to the SBU, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry of Defense, the State Border Service (SBS), the State Emergency Service (GSChS), the State Penitentiary Service, the State Security Department and other departments are obliged to look for terrorists.

The Antiterrorist Center (ATC) under the SBU is coordinating the actions of all law enforcement and civilian agencies involved, according to the law, in the ATO. The ATC has its own headquarters, which at the time of the Boeing crash was in charge of the fighting in the Donbass, and the Interdepartmental Coordination Commission (ICC) of the ATC, which coordinates activities in the ATO zone.
For the direct daily management of the ATO and control over the situation in the zone of its conduct, the operational headquarters of the ATO operates, a key role in which belongs to the SBU, the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

The first head of the ATC in the conditions of a real armed conflict in the Donbass and the paralysis of the authorities was I. O. head of this structure Vitaly Tsyganok, appointed to this position on March 1.

On July 7, Petro Poroshenko appointed Vasily Hrytsak to the post of head of the ATC. Perhaps this appointment meant that the leadership of the SBU refused to claim to be the actual leader of the hostilities in the ATO zone. From that moment on, the main responsibility for their implementation finally fell on the military, namely on the General Staff of the Armed Forces and its chief, Viktor Muzhenko.

Since June, the role of the IWC as a coordinating body has significantly decreased, while at the same time the role of the “small headquarters” – the ATO operational headquarters, in which Viktor Muzhenko, Vasily Gritsak, Serhiy Yarovoy and the commander of the National Guard Stepan Poltorak play the main role – has increased.

Each of them relies on the extensive apparatus of their departments, if necessary, using the direct support of the ministers. For example, the deputy commander of the National Guard Nikolai Balan, who previously held the position of head of the Department of the Crimean Territorial Command of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, is responsible for equipping the units of the National Guard in the ATO zone with equipment and weapons.
At the same time, Interior Minister Arsen Avakov personally exercises constant control over the activities of the National Guard in the ATO zone.
Thus, as a result of the lack of a clear regulation of the competences of command and control bodies and decision-making on military operations in the ATO zone, doubling and tripling of command bodies in its structure, there are signs of "controlled chaos" and the desire to avoid personal responsibility for the given orders.

At the same time, in the armed forces of any state there is a clear system of service hierarchy for making decisions and issuing combat orders. Especially if units and subunits of various types of armed forces are used in the combat zone.

In this case, both ground air defense units were used, providing air reconnaissance and the issuance of information about the air situation to command posts, and aviation units, including not only combat aircraft and their crews, but also a large number of ground personnel, including guidance navigators , fire spotters, airfield support personnel, navigation services, etc. Those. there is the use in one place of various types of troops, forces and means.

According to the experts of the analytical group, it is logical to believe that the decision on the combat use of various types of military force, especially in the conduct of hostilities by units of various law enforcement agencies, is competent to be taken exclusively by an official who has power over his subordinate troops and armed formations. Those. senior leadership of the ATO.

5.5. Assessment of the state of the military-political situation in the area of ​​the crash of the Boeing 777 on the eve and after the crash

On April 14, 2014, Oleksandr Turchynov signed a decree on the conduct of the ATO in the east of Ukraine and on April 15 announced the start of the ATO in the north of the Donetsk region.

In accordance with the Law of Ukraine dated May 31, 2005 No. 2600-IV (as amended and supplemented) “On Combating Terrorism”:
anti-terrorist operation - a set of coordinated special measures aimed at preventing, preventing and stopping criminal acts carried out with a terrorist goal, freeing hostages, neutralizing terrorists, minimizing the consequences of a terrorist act or other crime carried out with a terrorist goal;
the area of ​​the anti-terrorist operation - areas of terrain or water areas, vehicles, buildings, structures, premises and territories or water areas determined by the leadership of the anti-terrorist operation, which are adjacent to them, and within which the said operation is carried out;
regime in the area of ​​the anti-terrorist operation - a special procedure that may be introduced in the area of ​​the anti-terrorist operation for the duration of its conduct and provide for the provision of special powers to the subjects of the fight against terrorism, specified by this Law, necessary for the release of hostages, ensuring the safety and health of citizens who are in the area conducting an anti-terrorist operation, the normal functioning of public authorities, local governments, enterprises, institutions, organizations.

To manage a specific ATO and manage the forces and means that are involved in the implementation of anti-terrorist measures, an operational headquarters is formed, headed by the head of the Anti-Terrorist Center under the SBU or a person replacing him.

It is the head of the operational headquarters who determines the boundaries of the area where the anti-terrorist operation is to be carried out, and decides on the use of forces and means involved in its conduct. And, if necessary, submits proposals to the National Security and Defense Council regarding the introduction of a state of emergency in Ukraine or in certain regions. Interference in the operational management of the anti-terrorist operation by any person, regardless of position, is not allowed. That is, in fact, even the President does not have the right to give instructions during the ATO.

Rice. 5. Map of combat operations of the ATO on July 17, 2014 13:36

Aviation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has resumed combat missions in the ATO area. Combat aircraft of the Armed Forces of Ukraine inflicted several targeted strikes on Grad multiple launch rocket systems, checkpoints, strong points, concentrations of manpower and equipment of mercenary militants.
12 flights per day Air Force and 17 sorties of helicopters of the army aviation of the Ground Forces with the aim of attacking the positions of militants, delivering humanitarian supplies and search and rescue support.

Rice. 6 ATO combat operations map on July 18, 2014 13:36

Over the past 24 hours, the anti-terrorist operation has advanced 10-15 km deep into the territory controlled by the militants, and close the ring around them in the Lugansk region and state border Ukraine. This was stated by the speaker of the Information Center of the National Security and Defense Council Andrei Lysenko. The terrorists prevent a public international investigation into the crash of a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 and interfere with the work of Ukrainian specialists at the scene of the tragedy.

5.6. Evaluation of Officials' Coverage of the Boeing 777 Downfall (Speeches by European Leaders, the United States and Malaysia)

According to The New York Times, Vladimir Putin called Barack Obama on Thursday, July 17, in the morning Washington time. The subject of conversation was new American sanctions - the President of Russia said that they were unfair, and the President of the United States demanded that he stop supporting the separatists in the East of Ukraine. The conversation was tense, nervous, and lasted about an hour. About halfway through the conversation, Putin was told about the downed plane, and he told Obama about it. The details were not yet known at that moment, and the presidents continued to talk about sanctions. That same day, it became clear that President Obama needed to make a statement about this.

The text of the statement was sent by speechwriters from the White House. Josh Earnest handed the text to Obama, saying that, according to unconfirmed reports, there were 23 Americans on board the downed airliner. The President's statement was brief. He said that the US government is investigating the circumstances of the tragedy and is in constant contact with the parties concerned. As the President made his announcement, Vice President Joe Biden was talking to Petro Poroshenko, who told him about an intercepted conversation between the separatists, where they say they shot down a civilian plane.

That is, Petro Poroshenko became the primary source of information about who could do this.

The next day, July 18, Barack Obama made a lengthy statement to Boeing: “There is evidence indicating that the plane was shot down by a surface-to-air missile fired from territory inside Ukraine controlled by Russian-backed separatists.”

BUT THE LAUNCH PLACE, THE EVIDENCE OF THE LAUNCH STILL HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, although the Americans had a satellite over this place at that hour and know exactly what happened and how. From a satellite, such a launch is visible at a glance, and if these confirmations existed, then the world would have seen them long ago from an extended press conference of the American intelligence services.

“We also know that this is not the first plane shot down in eastern Ukraine. In recent weeks, pro-Russian separatists shot down a Ukrainian transport plane and a Ukrainian helicopter, and claimed responsibility for the downing of a Ukrainian fighter jet. Moreover, we know that these separatists receive constant assistance from Russia, including weapons and training. They also receive heavy weapons, including anti-aircraft systems.”

17.07.2014
Facebook of the Advisor to the Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Anton Gerashchenko (18:36:21):
“4.20 pm: Near the village of Grabovo in Torez, a missile from the Buk air defense missile system shot down a Malaysia Airlines passenger plane flying from Kuala Lumpur to Amsterdam. The liner was flying at an altitude of about 10 kilometers when the terrorists used the Buk air defense system. According to official figures, there were 280 passengers and 15 crew members on board. The terrorists confirmed the fact that missiles hit the plane, calling it an AN, not a Boeing.”

After the death of a Malaysian Boeing aircraft in the east of the country, Zoryan Shkiryak, adviser to the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, called on the United States and NATO to help the Ukrainian military conduct a special operation against the militias. “The United States should immediately provide us with modern precision weapons and support from the air, and NATO should start a ground military operation for protection,” Shkiryak wrote on Facebook.

UK Government statement:
“So far, we do not have specific information about exactly how this tragedy occurred. So I don't want to speculate at this stage. We are confident that the investigation of the incident should be led by the UN. We are ready to assist in the investigation provide the resources and specialists of the investigation unit aviation accidents(AAIB). We believe that British representatives were on board. We check passenger details to determine the number and identity of UK citizens. We will inform the families of the victims as soon as we have more information."

The Prime Minister of Malaysia said that although the Ukrainian side considers the plane shot down, "at this stage, Malaysia cannot reliably determine the cause of the tragedy, but we must find out and find out exactly what happened to this flight." He also stated that Malaysia would take a direct part in the investigation and if it turns out that the plane was indeed shot down, Malaysia will insist that those responsible be brought to justice immediately.

18.07.14
British Prime Minister David Cameron called the incident "a direct result of Russia's destabilization of an independent state" and said that "if President Putin does not change his approach to the situation in Ukraine, Europe and the West will have to fundamentally change their approach to Russia."

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott accused Russia of supplying the militia with the anti-aircraft missile system from which the Malaysian Boeing 777 was shot down. Russia, then Russia has a significant share of the responsibility,” Abbott said. At the same time, he expressed confidence that the cause of the crash was the Kremlin's desire to "muddy the waters" in Ukraine.

“The Security Service of Ukraine opened criminal proceedings under Article 258 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (terrorist act) in connection with the crash of a Malaysian plane in the Donetsk region. Criminal proceedings have been opened under the article “terrorist attack,” the press center of the SBU reported.

20.07.2014
US Embassy in Moscow: “We estimate that MH17 was likely shot down by a Buk surface-to-air missile from separatist-controlled territory in eastern Ukraine. We base this judgment on several factors:

Over the past month, we have seen an increasing amount of heavy weapons flowing towards the separatists across the border between Russia and Ukraine. Russia sent a convoy to the separatists last weekend military equipment up to 150 vehicles, including tanks, armored personnel carriers, artillery and multiple launch rocket systems. We also have information indicating that Russia is providing training to separatist fighters at a facility in southwestern Russia, which includes air defense training.
Pro-Russian separatist fighters demonstrated mastery of surface-to-air missile systems and shot down recent months more than a dozen aircraft, including two large transport aircraft.

At the same time that flight MH17 lost contact, we detected a ground-to-air missile launch from a separatist-controlled area in eastern Ukraine. We believe it was a Buk missile.

Intercepts of separatist communications posted on YouTube by the Ukrainian government indicate that the separatists were in possession of the Buk system as early as Monday, July 14. In intercepted communications, the separatists repeatedly mention the Buk systems they have and are redeploying.

Materials published in in social networks on Thursday, a Buk system is shown passing through the separatist-controlled towns of Torez and Snezhnoye, located near the site of the crash and believed to be the site of a surface-to-air missile launch. From this location, the Buk was able to shoot down the MH17, as it has sufficient range and altitude.

Ukraine also has Buk systems in service, but we are confident that none of the Ukrainian air defense systems were in the crash area. Also, Ukrainian forces did not launch any surface-to-air missiles during the conflict, despite frequently complaining about violations of their airspace by Russian military aircraft.

Shortly after the crash, separatists - including the self-proclaimed "defense minister" of the Donetsk People's Republic Igor Strelkov - claimed on social media that they had shot down a military transport plane.

In an intercepted conversation widely shared online, a prominent separatist leader tells the interlocutor that a separatist unit shot down the plane. After it became clear that the plane was a civilian airliner, the separatists deleted social media posts boasting of shooting down the plane and having a Buk surface-to-air missile system.

The audio data provided to the press by the Ukrainian security service was evaluated by intelligence community analysts, who confirmed, by comparing audio posted online by Ukraine with recordings of conversations by known separatists, that these were genuine conversations between known separatist leaders. Video footage posted on social media yesterday shows the Buk being transported through the Krasnodon area back to Russia. Video footage shows that at least one missile is missing from the system, which may indicate that a launch has taken place.
Events on the ground in the crash area clearly demonstrate that the separatists are in full control of the area."

Britain's new defense minister Michael Fallon, in an interview with the Mail on Sunday, called Russia a "sponsor of terrorism", adding that the Russians should "get out of eastern Ukraine, leaving Ukraine to the Ukrainians." On the same evening, it became known that the leaders of Germany, France and Great Britain announced their readiness to impose additional sanctions on Russia if Putin did not take urgent measures to facilitate an international investigation into the causes of the incident.

25.07.2014
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said that the Malaysian authorities consider it premature to make accusations until there is irrefutable evidence about the causes of the disaster: “Now there are a huge number of questions that require unambiguous answers. Among them - whether the plane was shot down by a missile, who did it, who supplied the weapons, whether it was a mistake or a pre-planned action,” said Najib Razak. According to him, Malaysia "will not point to anyone until it receives irrefutable evidence of what happened."

25.07.2014
The United States refuses to release its intelligence data on the downing of the Malaysian plane, does not know exactly who pressed the rocket launch button, but is confident that Russia is responsible, whose information about the location of Ukrainian troops is allegedly incorrect, said US State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf.

02.08.2014
In an interview with the French newspaper Midi Libre, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen described the July 17 tragedy as a war crime. “We have a lot of evidence that indicates that the Russian-backed separatists are guilty,” he argued. Fogh Rasmussen declined to comment on exactly what kind of information pointing to the guilt of one side or another, NATO has. Headquarters also evaded clarification on this matter.

13.10.2014
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott said that during the upcoming G20 summit in Brisbane in November, Russian President Vladimir Putin will have to answer tough questions about the downing of Malaysian flight MH17. "I'm attacking (shirtfront) Mr. Putin, you can be sure," the Australian prime minister said, adding that he would tell Putin that the Australians who died in the plane crash were killed by "rebels using Russian-supplied equipment."

An analysis of the speeches of officials and the media indicates that literally in the first hours after the death of the Boeing 777, a large number (more than 100) of materials appeared in the media of a number of Western countries (primarily the United States and Great Britain), in which the blame for the death of the aircraft was assigned to the Russian Federation . Moreover, the authors of the articles and officials did not provide a single fact or evidence indicating the involvement of the Russian side in the downing of the Boeing 777. All the materials cited either links to social networks, or to statements by the Ukrainian side, or to closed sources. characteristic feature statements and cited materials is that they were made BEFORE the publication of the results of any commission, which included interested parties (Ukraine, in whose airspace the accident occurred; Malaysia, as the owner of the aircraft; USA, as the country of manufacture of the aircraft), and according to established rules, in this case, an interstate commission of inquiry is created. Representatives of such a commission arrived in the Donetsk region only on 07/21/2014 and were forced to leave the area on 08/08/2014 due to the intensification of hostilities.

According to the experts of the analytical group, the speeches of the leaders of European states and the United States, which followed immediately after the death of the Boeing 777, as well as in the first days after it, were not accompanied by any evidence. This indicates that they did not have this evidence then and now. These speeches, in fact, were extremely tendentious accusations, taking us aside, and intended to directly or indirectly accuse the leadership of the Russian Federation of being involved in the death of the aircraft.

The American side has repeatedly stated that it has irrefutable evidence at its disposal about the guilt of the Russian side and the DRN in the downing of the Boeing 777, but none of the evidence was not only not given, but not voiced.

This suggests that the side accusing Russia was bluffing and continues to bluff now. The delay in publishing the results of the crash investigation is not because the investigation is too complex, but because the conclusions from it are too disadvantageous. Most likely, there are no damaging elements from the Buk-M1 air defense system in the bodies of the dead. If they are not there, then there is no fundamental possibility to pin the blame on the militias.

5.7. The progress of the investigation into the causes of the crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777

07/17/2014 Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk ordered to urgently create a government commission to clarify the circumstances of the crash in the Donetsk region of the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777, following the course Amsterdam (Netherlands) - Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). On the same day, President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko initiated the creation of a State Commission with the involvement of ICAO specialists and other international structures to investigate the tragedy with the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 in the Donetsk region.

On July 19, 2014, employees of the Malaysian investigative structures flew to Ukraine to participate in the work of the international commission. On the same day, a group of international experts arrived to investigate the crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777 (the commission of 31 people included most of the representatives of the Netherlands - 23 people, two from Germany and the USA, one from the UK, as well as three representatives of the Australian Embassy). The commission began work only on 07/21/2014, when by the middle of the day four Dutch experts managed to get to the crash site. After that, intensive shelling of the territory where the wreckage of the Boeing 777 was located began, and the representatives of the commission stopped their work on the ground. After several unsuccessful attempts, the commission, already composed of 101 international experts, nevertheless managed to reach the place of the death of the Malaysian Boeing on 07/31/2014. But they did not manage to work for a long time - the fighting continued, the experts returned to Donetsk on the same day. The work of the commission at the place of death cannot be called complete, since its representatives at the date of publication of the preliminary report (09/09/2014) could not collect all the fragments of the aircraft for the purpose of subsequent detailed analysis.

07/22/2014 The authorities of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) handed over two "black boxes" from a Boeing 777 that crashed in Ukraine to experts from Malaysia, on the condition that international ICAO experts be given access to them.

07/22/2014 President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, during a visit to the Malaysian Embassy in Kyiv, instructed the Ukrainian security forces to stop hostilities and operations within a radius of 40 km from the crash site of the Malaysian airliner. “I gave an instruction: immediately, within a radius of 40 kilometers from the site of the tragedy, Ukrainian servicemen should not conduct operations and should not open fire,” Poroshenko told reporters, Interfax-Ukraine reports.

07/22/2014 in the Donetsk region, Ukrainian Air Force planes launched a missile attack near the city of Shakhtyorsk, which is only 30 kilometers from the site of the death of the Malaysian Boeing 777. Thus, the military violated the order of Petro Poroshenko to stop hostilities in that area so as not to interfere with the investigation. As a RIA correspondent reported, in addition to the air strike on Shakhtyorsk, the military fired from Grad installations: the sounds of volleys and explosions were heard near the village of Grabovo, in the vicinity of which the wreckage of the liner is located.

On July 23, 2014, Malaysian officials handed over the flight recorders of a Malaysian Boeing 777 airliner to investigators from the Dutch Safety Board, which is leading the international investigation into the crash. On the same day, the recorders were handed over to the British experts of the Office of Investigation aviation incidents, and in the laboratory of Farnborough (Great Britain) they began to decipher them.

On July 24, 2014, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted a resolution on the Boeing crash in eastern Ukraine. The document contains a demand to immediately stop hostilities in the area of ​​the crash and to conduct an impartial international investigation. Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin warned against unsubstantiated accusations and asked to take into account that Kyiv will try to use the situation with the death of Boeing to build up a military operation.

Ukraine is not going to stop hostilities in the east of the country for the duration of the investigation into the circumstances of the death of the Malaysian liner. This was announced on July 24, 2014 by Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. This directly indicates the unwillingness of the Ukrainian side to contribute as much as possible to the disclosure of the circumstances and the clarification of the causes of the death of the Boeing 777.

According to Yatsenyuk, the place of the plane's death is quite far from the battlefield. “For me personally, it is more priority to free Ukraine from those who encroach on the territorial integrity of the country. There are Ukrainians who are in danger. These pro-Russian rebels are killing them. I can not wait. Responsibility for the fate of these people lies with the government and the president,” Interfax reported the words of the prime minister.

The prime minister also recalled that in a zone with a radius of 40 kilometers around the place where the Malaysian passenger liner fell, Poroshenko ordered the fire to cease.

“The earlier announced ceasefire provides for the creation of humanitarian corridors for access to the accident site. But it depends on the rebels whether they will allow the collection of evidence,” Yatsenyuk said.

Thus, despite the order of the President to stop hostilities around the crash site, the Ukrainian military repeatedly violated this order. Experts from Malaysia were unable to reach the scene of the tragedy because of the shelling of the highway leading to the village of Grabovo, very close to the place where the plane crashed. On the day when the experts examined the wreckage of the liner, July 22, the shooting was carried out only 19 kilometers from Grabovo.

08/02/2014 According to RIA Novosti, a group of observers of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which arrived at the site of the death of the Malaysian Boeing 777 in eastern Ukraine, was forced to leave the crash site due to the shelling.

On August 8, 2014, members of the international commission investigating the Boeing 777 crash in the Donetsk region returned to Holland from Ukraine, having not worked there for a total of a week. At the same time, it was originally planned that a thorough study of the crash site of the Boeing 777 would take at least a month. The experts failed to collect the wreckage of the aircraft, and without this, scientific conclusions about the causes of the disaster are impossible. It was reported that the “first stage” was completed, the meaning of which, in fact, was reduced to the fact that the commission could not work. The timing of the second phase was not reported.

08/11/2014 The Dutch public organization De Ommeker ("Turn") issued an open letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin. It condemns the path chosen by Washington and Brussels to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. They also apologize on behalf of the majority of citizens of the Netherlands for the actions of their government and the media, for "perverted facts regarding the death of the Boeing-777 near Donetsk."

“Terrible accusations are being made against Russia, without any evidence, without an investigation, without presenting fragments of the weapon that allegedly shot down MH17,” the authors of the letter note. “We have to be only powerless observers and witnesses of the fact that Western countries, led by the United States, accuse Russia of crimes that they themselves commit on a scale incomparable to anyone else,” reads a letter published on the official website of De Ommeker.

09/14/2014 OSCE observers came under artillery fire at the site of the death of the Malaysian Boeing 777. The shell hit the car, the OSCE staff were able to leave the scene on the second vehicle, none of them were injured.

10/11/2014 “It is still not safe for Western experts to conduct an investigation at the place of death,” Reuters quotes Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte. “I’m furious because we know that a truce has been declared and there should be a buffer zone, but in fact there is neither one nor the other.”

Armed formations of Ukraine have repeatedly shelled the area where the wreckage of the Boeing 777 fell. It is obvious that such shelling has a dual purpose. On the one hand, to make it as difficult as possible to identify the ammunition that hit the aircraft in the air, and on the other hand, to prevent the normal work of experts.

In view of the fact that fighting is taking place at the site of the Boeing 777 crash, experts are not able to conduct a thorough inspection of the crash site and collect the wreckage.

Throughout the time that has passed since the crash of the Boeing 777, there has been a clear trend towards obstructing the work of the commission and avoiding truthful and complete coverage of the situation in the media. At the same time, it becomes clear that the suppression of such facts as the publication of negotiations between Ukrainian dispatchers and the Boeing crew before and during the crash, as well as the obstacle to identifying witnesses and direct contact with them comes from the special services and law enforcement agencies of the Ukrainian side (SBU, MO, Headquarters ATO). There is a policy of isolating key witnesses who can shed light on the circumstances of the crash of the Boeing 777 and, thereby, help the international commission to conduct a transparent investigation.

According to the experts of the analytical group, the shelling of the territory where the wreckage of the Boeing 777 is located makes it much more difficult to collect them for the purpose of subsequent detailed analysis, which is necessary to establish the causes, circumstances and perpetrators of the death of the aircraft.

One of the reasons for the intensive shelling of the territory, which hinders the normal work of experts at the crash site, may be an attempt to hide all the circumstances of this case. For example, the one who led the artillery shelling of the area where parts of the Boeing are located - to destroy the wreckage of the aircraft and the bodies of passengers with artillery shells so that it becomes impossible to examine them. Such a task could be solved by artillery installations if the spread of parts of the aircraft was not as great as in this particular case. The second purpose of the artillery work at the site of the fall of debris may be to create an official reason for not surveying the area properly.

It is obvious that the empty fields on which the wreckage of the aircraft fell are of no interest as a military target, and the gunners are firing at the coordinates indicated to them by the higher headquarters.

Hence the conclusion that the higher headquarters of the ATO instructed the gunners to treat the place where the fragments of the aircraft fell in order to prevent the normal course of the investigation, since the true results of the investigation are not beneficial to the headquarters and the leadership of the ATO.

Responsibility for this lies with the party carrying out the fire impact at the crash site.

5.8. Comparison of the course of the investigation into the causes of the crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777 with the course and results of the investigation into the circumstances of the death of the TU-154 that occurred in the sky of Ukraine on 04.10.2001

In this situation, it seems appropriate to compare the course of the investigation into the death of the Boeing 777 with another catastrophe that occurred in the sky of Ukraine on 04.10.2001, namely the death of the Tu-154M of Siberia Airlines, which was operating flight SBI1812 en route Tel Aviv - Novosibirsk. Let's compare some of the circumstances revealed during the investigation of these tragedies and their consequences:

It is not without interest what the US position is in similar situations. On July 3, 1988, an Airbus A300B2-203 of Iran Air operated a commercial passenger flight IR655 between Tehran (Iran) and Dubai (UAE) with an intermediate stop at Bandar Abbas (Iran). Despite the fact that the flight took place within the 35-kilometer-wide international air corridor, the aircraft was shot down over Persian Gulf missile fired from the US Navy guided missile cruiser Vincennes, which was in Iranian territorial waters. The missile hit the plane directly and tore it in two. Flight 655 crashed into the water, killing all 290 people on board. The US government said the Iranian plane was mistakenly identified as an Iranian Air Force F-14 fighter.

US President Ronald Reagan called the incident “correct defensive action,” and only after a trial in the International Court of Justice did the US authorities agree to pay compensation to the families of the victims. After 8 years and litigation, on February 26, 1996, the United States agreed to pay Iran compensation in the amount of $61.8 million for 248 dead, at the rate of $300,000 for each able-bodied victim and $150,000 for each dependent. The United States refused to compensate for the cost of the aircraft (about $30 million). At the same time, this compensation was unambiguously considered by the United States as a unilateral voluntary act, since the US government did not take responsibility for what happened. In 1988, US Vice President George W. Bush, in particular, said: "I will never apologize for the United States of America, no matter what the facts."

According to the experts of the analytical group, the delay in the investigation into the causes of the disaster is due to the actions of the Ukrainian side and the unconditional assistance of the United States in this matter.

The practice of investigating air crashes is as follows: on the day of the crash, a state commission should be created on the territory of the state where the emergency occurred, and on the same day it is necessary to start investigating the causes.

The Kyiv authorities did not stop hostilities in the area of ​​the disaster and, thus, hindered the work of international experts. In the first weeks after the death, the most important examinations and studies (collection and laying out of the wreckage of the aircraft, search for damaging elements, pathoanatomical examinations) necessary in such cases were not carried out.

The Kyiv authorities acted in this way precisely because it is unprofitable for them to have an objective investigation.

5.9. Preliminary results of the Dutch Safety Board investigation

09.09.2014 The Netherlands published a preliminary report on the causes of the crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777 in Ukraine. According to the report, "the aircraft broke apart mid-air, likely as a result of structural damage caused by the external impact of numerous high-energy objects." The Dutch experts promise to present the final conclusions to the world in the summer of 2015.

In fact, the investigation does not need a year to establish the cause of the plane's death. It is enough to show the experts these “high-energy objects” extracted from the body of the aircraft and the bodies of passengers, and in a minute they will say with what weapon and how exactly the Malaysian Boeing 777 was shot down. , then the objective conclusions of experts will not keep you waiting.

Magazine "Expert" on the same day published summary report: “As follows from the report, the experts did not find any signs of technical problems with the aircraft. Erroneous actions of the crew were also not recorded. A full listening-in of communications between crew members in the cockpit, recorded on the cockpit voice recorders, revealed no indication of technical faults or an emergency on board. “There was not a single warning signal that could be heard in the cockpit that could indicate technical problems,” the expert commission found. The flight data recorder did not register any warnings from the aircraft systems and the aircraft engines parameters were consistent with normal operation during the flight. The flight recorders did not register any flight abnormalities. But seconds before the crash, the plane arbitrarily changed course. Numerous holes were found on the cockpit. “Among the holes, there are both large “ragged” holes and small pinholes that look like bullet holes. The Dutch do not draw any conclusions from this. So the question remains where exactly the plane was attacked from.”

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak welcomed the publication of the preliminary report, stressing that the document confirms that the liner was technically sound and the crew acted according to the rules.

In response to the publication of the Dutch document, the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency sent a list of 24 actions to be taken first to the commission investigating the crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777 aircraft. The list was presented by the deputy head of the agency, Oleg Storchev (see Appendix 1). It contains proposals for the analysis of the air and radar situation, the preparation of the flight and the aircraft, as well as the study of flight recorders.

On 10/11/2014, the relatives of the dead citizens of the Netherlands announced that they would sue the authorities of the Netherlands for improperly investigating the tragedy. “They are not in good faith, as the investigation is progressing very slowly, and the experts did not even visit the crash site, although it was possible,” said lawyer Bob van der Goen, who represents the interests of the relatives of the victims.

Although in the preliminary report on the downing of the Boeing 777, neither V. Putin nor the formations of the self-proclaimed DPR were found guilty, unfounded accusations against them have already been made and taken for granted.

According to the experts of the analytical group, the report is superficial and does not allow drawing specific conclusions regarding the circumstances and causes of the death of the Boeing 777. Although, in order to make a complete and complete report, the experts had both the time and the necessary materials.
The information given in the report only indicates that the liner was attacked from the outside and fell apart in the air due to "a lot of high-energy objects hitting it."
The preliminary report deliberately left open a lot of questions in order to not give an opportunity to remove suspicions about Russia and the DPR.
A full report will not be ready until the summer of 2015, so that the doubts and speculations sown will germinate in the minds of the general public for at least another year, and during this time the geopolitical situation may change dramatically and the results of the investigation will lose their relevance, black PR regarding DNR and Russia by this time will play its role, economic and moral damage will be inflicted on a large scale.

5.10. Conclusions of other experts

5.10.1 RSI version confirmations

On August 7, the Malaysian newspaper New Straits Times covered an article by Associated Press and Newsweek reporter Robert Parry "Flight MH17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts", published on August 3 by the independent GlobalResearch. Parry casts doubt on the Buk version and, in particular, reports that an independent study indicates that the cause of the death of the airliner was shelling from a fighter.
We are talking about the study of Lufthansa pilot Peter Haizenko, who, pointing to the bullet entry holes centered around the cockpit, writes: “These are small holes, round and clean, showing the entry points, most likely a 30 mm caliber projectile.” Khaizenko concluded that the Boeing was damaged both from the starboard and from the port side, this excludes the version that the liner was fired from the ground. “No one before Khaizenko noticed that the shells tore the skin on both sides. This means that a ground-to-air missile strike is ruled out, writes New Straits Times. The words of Michael Bociurkiw, an OSCE official who happened to be at the crash site, confirm the same version: “There were several parts of the fuselage that looked like they had come under very, very heavy machine gun fire.” The reliability of this version was also confirmed in the film by Arkady Mamontov “Flight MH17. Aborted flight of the Boeing”, which was shown on October 5 and 11, 2014 on the Rossiya TV channel.

5.10.2. Bundestag version

On September 17, the German Bundestag published on its website a memorandum stating that flight MH17 was shot down not by a Buk missile, but by a missile from the S-125 anti-aircraft missile system (NATO classification - SA-3). This is an old Soviet complex, which in Russia has long been decommissioned and replaced by the S-300. True, he is still in the armies of the former Soviet Union, including Ukraine.
The Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper writes: “The German Foreign Ministry sent this 8-page document, signed by State Secretary (Deputy Minister) of Foreign Affairs Markus Ederer, to the Bundestag on September 5, although it was published a little later. Loud statements to the press on this occasion were not made. Probably because, according to the German political scientist Kret Mayer, so as not to draw too much attention to the document. In fact, this memorandum became a forced response of the German Foreign Ministry to the request of the "left party" - the country's leading opposition force.
The government said that “the federal government has no confirmed information that MH17 was shot down by an anti-aircraft missile”, although, as we know, the West has unanimously claimed from the very beginning that the plane destroyed the Buk of “pro-Russian separatists”. The document says that on July 17, two NATO AWACS reconnaissance aircraft were in the airspace of Poland and Romania, which monitored everything that happened in Ukraine, including the operation of air defense systems, including their radars. It follows from the document that "both AWACS aircraft recorded signals from an air defense system identified as an SA-3 surface-to-air air defense system, as well as a signal from another radar device that could not be identified."
What SA-3 is is not explained (hardly by chance). However, experts know that SA-3, according to NATO classification, is precisely the S-125 air defense system, and not at all the Buk, on the use of which all accusations against Russia are based.
On September 19, the Bundestag clarified that the AWACS radars had indeed detected a movement that was automatically classified as a C-125 missile flight. This does not mean at all that the signal came from this type of missile. And, moreover, that it was she who caused the explosion of flight MH17 in the air.

According to the analytical group, all opinions of experts that differ from the official position of Washington do not receive wide resonance in the media.
The dominant position is any point of view, followed by the conclusion about the involvement of the Russian Federation and the DPR in the death of the Boeing 777.

6. Modeling the situation of the death of a Boeing 777

6.1. Model 1. The death of a Boeing 777 occurred as a result of an accidental attack by a single aircraft

6.1.1. Description of the situation according to Model 1
On July 17, 2014, a single combat aircraft of the party possessing the appropriate weapons, having on board a crew capable of carrying out the combat use of its military equipment, attacked a Boeing 777.

6.1.2. Arguments confirming the reliability of the situation according to Model 1
Availability of the technical possibility of destroying an air target of the Boeing 777 type by a combat aircraft (Su-25 or MiG-29 or other similar aircraft) in the "free hunting" mode.

6.1.3. Arguments refuting the possibility of a situation according to Model 1
The complexity of independent search and aiming of weapons at a single aircraft in the absence of its exact coordinates.
The need for personal motivation. If we assume that the pilot of the aircraft specifically chose the Malaysian Boeing 777, then he must have a strong personal motivation to use weapons on a civilian aircraft, which is unlikely. A prerequisite for the profession of a combat aircraft pilot is absolute mental health, which makes the assumption of his mental disorder untenable.

6.2. Model 2. The death of the Boeing 777 occurred as a result of the adoption of erroneous commands by the officials making the decision to conduct combat operations and the failure to take measures to prevent the use of weapons by a combat aircraft

6.2.1. Description of the situation according to Model 2
The pilot of a combat aircraft, in the course of working out combat training tasks, either misunderstood the command from the ground, or, instead of simulating the use of weapons, unintentionally used weapons on a civilian aircraft.

6.2.2. Arguments confirming the reliability of the situation according to Model 2
Numerous facts testifying to the low level of combat training of the military personnel of the armed forces of the state in whose airspace the Boeing 777 was killed can serve as an argument in favor of this version. Tel Aviv-Novosibirsk, when a civilian airliner was destroyed as a result of gross errors in the combat crew of the S-200V air defense system and low training and indiscretion of the military leadership of the armed forces of Ukraine during live-fire exercises.
Then the military-political leadership of Ukraine not only did not take responsibility for the deaths of 66 passengers and 12 crew members, but made it clear that they would not bear any legal or moral responsibility.
On October 10, 2001, President of Ukraine L. D. Kuchma answered journalists' questions about the causes of the Tu-154 plane crash on October 4, 2001 as follows:
“Look what is happening around the world, in Europe? We are not the first and not the last, there is no need to make a tragedy out of this. Mistakes happen everywhere, and not only on this scale, but on a much larger, planetary scale. If we do not lower ourselves below the civilized level, everything will be fine. And if we pour a bucket of dirt on ourselves, then you are welcome.

6.2.3. Arguments refuting the possibility of a situation according to Model 2
The presence of stuffing information in the media and social networks about the presence of air defense systems of the DPR of the Buk-M1 type and combat aircraft on the eve of the death of the Boeing 777. On July 10, Ukrainian intelligence recorded the appearance of a combat aircraft of an unknown brand among the militia. This was reported at the headquarters of the "anti-terrorist" operation. Half an hour before the crash of the plane, the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine "thrown" in the media information about the presence of air defense among the militias.
It must be understood that in the sphere of officials making a decision to attack a Boeing 777 are:
pilot of a combat aircraft who used weapons that caused the death of a Boeing 777;
ground personnel who carried out airfield maintenance of a combat aircraft;
guidance navigator who carried out target designation and guidance of a combat aircraft;
radar crews carrying out airspace reconnaissance and providing information about the air situation in the area of ​​the Boeing 777 crash;
an official who assigned the pilot the task of using weapons.

Moreover, all these persons must have the appropriate means of performing the task: a combat aircraft equipped with appropriate weapons, an airfield, airfield technical support facilities (fuel and air tankers, power generators, control and measuring stations, etc.), radar stations, target designation and guidance equipment, means of communication and information transmission.

In accordance with the practice of command and control, the fulfillment by subordinates of the tasks set by the leadership depends on a combination of four conditions:
1. understanding by subordinates of orders received by them;
2. their belief that the leadership is acting in accordance with the interests of the state and the armed forces;
3. their belief that given combat orders are in their own interests;
4. their physical and mental ability to obey.

The ability to clearly and clearly formulate combat missions is an inalienable quality of any commander, as a link in the military control circuit, and in this case, a superior commander with the appropriate authority had to give a deliberately criminal order to the pilot of a combat aircraft.

The leaks of information on the eve of the downing of the Boeing 777 strikingly coincided with the position of the Ukrainian leadership literally in the first minutes after the crash, when the DPR militia was blamed for the death of the aircraft, and the Russian Federation was blamed for it.

6.3. Model 3. The death of the Boeing 777 is deliberate and is the result of deliberate actions by the military-political leadership

6.3.1. Description of the situation according to Model 3
On July 17, 2014, a Boeing 777 operated by Malaysia Airlines was flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur along the corridor set by the air traffic controllers. At the same time, the route of the aircraft was shifted to the north compared to the routes followed by similar flights before and after the death of the Boeing 777.
At 17.17–17.20 Boeing 777 was in the airspace of Ukraine near the city of Donetsk at an altitude of 10100 m.
It is possible that the true target was not a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 aircraft, but another, similar in outline and coloring, which was supposed to appear in the area in given time, but changed the course and time of the flight, which the persons who planned the operation did not know about.
An unidentified combat aircraft, which was one echelon lower on the opposite course in the cloud layer, having received target designation according to the air situation received from working radar stations, abruptly climbed, suddenly appeared from the clouds in front of the civil aircraft and opened fire on the cockpit (cockpit), firing shots from cannon armament of 30 mm or smaller caliber.
As a result of multiple hits of shells, the cockpit was damaged, its sharp depressurization, which led to the instant death of the crew from mechanical stress and decompression. The attack was sudden and lasted for a fraction of a second, the crew, due to the circumstances, could not give the warning signals set in such cases, since the flight proceeded in the normal mode, and no one expected an attack.
Since neither the engines, nor the hydraulic system, nor other devices important for the continuation of the flight were disabled, the Boeing 777, controlled by the autopilot (which is a normal situation), continued to perform level flight, possibly losing altitude smoothly.
The pilot of an unidentified combat aircraft maneuvered the Boeing 777 into the rear hemisphere. After that, the unidentified aircraft lay down on a combat course, the pilot provided target tracking with the aircraft's on-board equipment, carried out aiming and launched R-60 or R-73 missiles.
As a result of the rocket hit, the cabin was depressurized, the aircraft control system was disrupted, the autopilot turned off, the aircraft stopped level flight and went into a tailspin. The resulting overload led to the mechanical destruction of the aircraft at high altitudes.

6.3.2. Arguments confirming the reliability of the situation according to Model 3
The Russian military recorded the operation of nine Kupol radars of the Ukrainian battery of the Buk-M1 air defense system on the day of the death of the Malaysian Boeing 777.
The presence of stuffing information about the guilt of the Russian side in the death of the Boeing 777 immediately after the crash may indicate that this operation was planned in the information war.

6.3.3. Arguments refuting the possibility of a situation according to Model 3
The need to involve a significant amount of human and material resources in the development and implementation of the operation.
The contour of military command, in this case, includes a significant number of officials:
Idea developer;
Person providing funding;
Decision maker (having the appropriate authority within the framework of the ATO);
The person carrying out the formulation of the combat mission;
The person(s) escorting the Boeing 777 and aiming the combat aircraft at the target;
A person who gives a combat order to the pilot of a combat aircraft to destroy an air target;
Combat aircraft pilot.
When a significant number of people are involved in a combat sabotage operation, information can be leaked, which is unacceptable in the development and implementation of covert operations. Of course, each of these persons can sign the appropriate non-disclosure obligations, but as a rule (which implies the secrecy of conducting such operations), immediately after their completion, the persons involved in the implementation are subject to isolation from possible leaks. And the more people involved in such a process, the less likely it is to keep it secret.

According to experts of the RSI analytical group, Model 3 seems to be the most likely (the death of the Boeing 777 is deliberate and is the result of deliberate actions of the military-political leadership), however, only a thorough investigation and interview of all persons involved in the circumstances of this case. An example of the necessary actions and information for study is presented in a letter sent on September 25, 2014 by the Deputy Head of the Federal Air Transport Agency, an authorized representative of the Russian Federation to participate in the investigation of the circumstances and causes of the Malaysia Airlines Boeing-777 crash, Oleg Storchev, to the International Commission of Investigation (Appendix 1 to this case study).

7. Parties involved in the development of the conflict situation related to the death of the Boeing 777

The death of the Malaysian Boeing 777 led to a significant expansion of the circle of states involved in this conflict situation. As the practice of the investigation shows, representatives of several countries are delegated to the commission: the country in whose airspace the accident occurred, the country that owns the aircraft, the country that produces the aircraft, and according to the established rules, in this case, an interstate commission of investigation is created.
In this case, states that were formally not involved in this event were also involved in one way or another in the situation with the death of the Boeing 777.

Ukraine

The death of the Boeing 777 occurred in the airspace of Ukraine. This country is in fact actively opposing a comprehensive investigation. Vitaliy Nayda, director of the counterintelligence department of the Security Service of Ukraine, in an interview with CNN expressed confidence that “a Russian trained, equipped, well-trained officer ... pressed this button on purpose” to shoot down a Malaysian Boeing over Ukraine.

Donetsk People's Republic (militias)

The wreckage of a Boeing 777 fell into the territory controlled by the DPR militia. DPR hands over black boxes to Malaysian side 22.07.2014

Russian Federation

She was accused by top officials of the United States and Great Britain of being guilty of the death of the Boeing 777. The death of the Boeing 777 was the reason for the tightening of sanctions against Russia.

Malaysia

Owner country of the Boeing 777. Participates in the investigation into the death of the aircraft. There were 45 Malaysian citizens on board the Boeing. On July 23, 2014, she handed over to the Dutch side the “black boxes” received from the DPR militias.
Noteworthy is the fact that the Malaysian side handed over the "black boxes" to the representatives of the Netherlands and their subsequent sending to the UK. It seemed that the owner of the aircraft should play the greatest role and activity in the investigation. This is an established practice. In this case, it doesn't.
This circumstance is connected not so much with the high qualification of British specialists, but with the fact that the sovereign state of Malaysia is still under the strongest influence of the United Kingdom. As you know, Malaysia has been a British colony for a long time, and is currently part of the British Commonwealth of Nations.
09/12/2014 Malaysian Attorney General Abdul Ghani Patail, in an interview with the New Straits Times, said that the criminal investigation into the causes of the disaster passenger liner in eastern Ukraine “is in full swing”, it is being carried out simultaneously in several directions. Investigators "recreated the plane in virtual form, using photo and video images taken directly from the crash site of the Boeing 777." The Prosecutor General also noted that, despite the ongoing international investigation, Malaysia also intends to find out the reasons and find the perpetrators of the July 17 tragedy on its own. Earlier, Patail indicated that the Malaysian side "intends to lead the legal process of bringing to justice those responsible for the crash of the liner, since all the evidence and evidence belongs to his country."

Australia

A country that lost its citizens as a result of the death of Boeing 27. Participates in the investigation of the death of the aircraft. 09/25/2014 Tony Abbott said that Australia will make every effort, together with the Netherlands and Malaysia, to ensure that the criminal investigation into the Boeing crash in the Donetsk region of Ukraine is not hushed up in any case.

Netherlands

Country from whose airport you started your flight last flight MH17 Boeing 777. There were 192 Dutch citizens on board. The Netherlands took the lead in the investigation into the crash of a Malaysian Airlines passenger jet in the Donetsk region. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said on July 22 in The Hague that the government of Ukraine has handed over to his country all the reins in the investigation.

Great Britain

A country that actively blames the Russian Federation for the downing of the Boeing 777. “The tragic loss of the Malaysian Airlines aircraft should be a catalyst for changing Russia's position and ending the conflict in Ukraine. Russia is trying to destabilize a sovereign state, violate its territorial integrity,” David Cameron told the New York Daily News on July 25, 2014.
“We in the UK are calling on our European partners to introduce tough new economic sanctions. Of course, some sanctions are not painless for any of us,” Cameron admitted. - Russia has great business ties with Europe, which is beneficial to all of us. Russian investors are a significant contributor to our economy, and Russian gas is an important source of energy for many, especially those without nuclear sources. Therefore, causing economic damage to Russia will be to some extent painful for our economies, too,” he said, adding that “serious economic sanctions are the only language.”

The "black boxes" of the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 that crashed in the Donetsk region were delivered to the UK on July 23, 2014 under the supervision of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). In the UK, experts at Farnborough took up the decoding of the flight recorders. This city near London is closely associated with aviation and is known as the site of one of the largest international air shows.
Due to historical and geopolitical features, Great Britain has the strongest levers of influence on Malaysia and the Netherlands, which explains the transfer of Boeing 777 flight recorders to the experts of this country.

Boeing 777 manufacturing country. Charged against the Russian Federation in his death. On July 26, 2014 at 11:53 am, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said that Russian President Vladimir Putin was responsible for the crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777 in Ukraine.
“We know that the Malaysian Airlines plane was hit by a rocket from the ground. We know that it was fired from separatist-controlled territory and at a time when Ukrainian air defenses were not working,” Ernest said.
“We saw that heavy weapons were transferred from Russia to Ukraine, which were later used by the separatists, whom Russia taught to use them. Among these weapons were air defense systems. And, judging by the messages on social networks, there were also SA-11 complexes (Buk air defense systems according to the US and NATO classification), the official representative of the White House added.
"So now we can conclude that Vladimir Putin and the Russians are to blame for this tragedy," he concluded.
Ernest went on to quote Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss: “The Russians fired themselves or those they trained fired, it’s the same thing. The tracks lead straight to Vladimir Putin.”
Previously, the White House did not directly blame Vladimir Putin for the death of the Boeing 777, blaming the separatists for the death of the liner.
Representatives of American intelligence on July 24 admitted that Washington does not have any information about the direct involvement of the Russian authorities in the tragedy.

According to the experts of the RSI analytical group, six states and one self-proclaimed republic are directly or indirectly involved in the case related to the death of the Boeing 777, of which the dominant position (under the auspices of the United States) is the accusation against the Russian Federation. The international community (UN), despite the repeated proposals of Russian diplomacy, has not developed an agreed position conducive to an objective investigation and the earliest announcement of its results.

8. Interest of the parties

An analysis of the dynamics of the situation associated with the death of the Boeing 777 indicates that most of the countries involved in this are not interested parties in the crash of the aircraft and the extraction of political and economic preferences from this event. The only country that has received certain dividends in the form of loans and borrowings is not Malaysia, but the country in the sky of which the death of the Boeing 777 occurred and which bears the lion's share of the responsibility for ensuring the safety of the work of the international team of experts. It was from her that proposals to the international community on organizational measures should have come, including proposals for the possibility of introducing UN forces into the area where the Boeing 777 crashed.
One gets the impression that the country whose plane crashed was not chosen by chance - the Malaysian plane was the victim of the tragedy, and not an American, German or English, or even a Russian airliner. The plane of the state, which is as far as possible from the crash site, which does not have significant weight in solving geopolitical problems, which has no access to the leading media platforms of the world, was attacked. In addition, the Malaysian side had already lost a similar aircraft in March of this year under very mysterious circumstances, and the results of the investigation did not clarify either the location of its wreckage, let alone the reasons for its disappearance. The criminals who planned the attack on the Boeing 777 acted taking into account geopolitical assessments of the situation and chose a country that does not have significant political weight, is not able to urgently demand and achieve a comprehensive and objective investigation, a country that will dutifully accept the position of the West in relation to those responsible for the death of the liner.

The death of the Boeing 777 is a tragedy that was necessary to bring charges against Russia, which so easily and painlessly annexed Crimea and Sevastopol, which were considered by the West as an unsinkable NATO aircraft carrier in the Black Sea. It is no secret that the plans to deploy NATO troops in Crimea were a reality, and the agreement on the lease of the Naval Base in Sevastopol by Russia could be declared criminal and insignificant by the Ukrainian side, moreover, concluded by the previous “corrupt” administration of Yanukovych. “Our decision on Crimea, among other things, was partly connected with this. Of course, first of all, and mainly, this is the support of the Crimeans, but also considerations such that if we do nothing, then at some time, guided by the same principles, they will drag Ukraine into NATO and say: you are not concerns. And NATO ships will end up in the city of naval glory, Sevastopol,” President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin said on April 17 during a live press conference.

The planned actions that led to the downing of the Boeing 777 are not just a tragic event on an international scale, but a tragic geopolitical event that entailed geopolitical consequences and acted as a catalyst for pressure on the Russian side. In March, the US and the EU began to impose sanctions against Russia in connection with the annexation of Crimea. The process of imposing sanctions continued as planned, but after the death of Boeing, it was intensified:
On July 18, the European Investment Bank, on the recommendation of the European Council, stopped new funding for projects in Russia;
On July 23, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development froze decision-making on new projects in Russia;
On July 26, the EU expanded the sanctions list by 15 people and 18 organizations, of which 9 are entities accused of undermining the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine; 9 - Crimean companies that changed ownership after the unilateral declaration of independence of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea;
On July 28, the website of the International Court of Arbitration in The Hague (Permanent Court of Arbitration, PCA) published a verdict in the Yukos case, which obliges Russia to pay the plaintiffs $ 50 billion. In addition, Russia was ordered to compensate legal costs of $ 65 million;
On July 30, the EU imposed sanctions against 8 people, as well as against the Russian National Commercial Bank, the Almaz-Antey air defense concern and the Dobrolyot airline. He also introduced sanctions in the areas of trade and investment against Crimea and Sevastopol;
On July 31, the EU imposed sanctions against Sberbank of Russia, VTB Bank, Gazprombank, Vnesheconombank, Rosselkhozbank. Also imposed an embargo on the import and export of weapons and similar material to Russia; a ban on the export of dual-use goods and technologies for military use to Russia or to Russian military end users. Obliged exporters to obtain prior permission from the competent authorities of the Member States to export certain types of energy equipment and technologies to Russia, and also introduced a ban on the supply to Russia of high-tech equipment for oil production in the Arctic, on the deep shelf and shale oil;
On August 7, NATO ceased cooperation with the Russian Federation;
On September 12, the EU continued imposing sanctions. In particular, he included nine Russian defense concerns in the sanctions list: the Sirius Concern, Stankoinstrument, Khimkompozit, the Kalashnikov Concern, the Tula Arms Plant, Engineering Technologies, NPO High Precision Complexes, the Almaz- Antey" and NPO "Basalt". He included twenty-four people on the sanctions list.

Of course, the sanctions hit Russia, but the main goal is to cause maximum damage to economic relations between Russia and Europe by destroying mutually beneficial ties with the Russian Federation.

9. Beneficiaries

Analyzing the consequences of the death of the Boeing 777, it is necessary to answer the question: which side benefited in this situation and which suffered losses.

9.1. As for the parties that suffered losses, they are the DPR, the Russian Federation and, oddly enough, Malaysia.
The Malaysian side, in addition to real human losses, suffered economic damage - the shares of Malaysian Airlines fell on 07/18/2014 by 11.1%. Malaysia Airlines has been unprofitable for several years now, with losses exceeding RM4.5 billion ($1.4 billion) since early 2011. Over the past 9 months, its market value has decreased by more than 40%.
The company and, accordingly, the country that owns the company suffered significant reputational losses in terms of the attractiveness of their service for tourists. The statements of the Malaysian side about the available intelligence about the causes of the death of the Boeing 777 and the need for an objective investigation do not find a proper response from the world community. Nobody listens to Malaysia.
The self-proclaimed Donetsk Republic also did not become a beneficiary from the death of the aircraft. She became the main culprit in the disaster. As a result, in the eyes of the world community, the DPR is now firmly associated with a terrorist formation that does not stop to achieve its separatist goals in front of the death of not only legal representatives of the Ukrainian authorities, but also civilians of other states. The accusations of the DPR also touched on Russia as an "accomplice of terrorists."

9.2.1 It is obvious that the downing of the Boeing 777, no matter how blasphemous it sounds, brought great benefits to the new authorities in Kiev, who needed international financial and military-technical assistance, political and informational support in order to reverse the unfavorable military situation in the Donbass and hold on to power to the political elite.
The Ukrainian "party of war" has received and continues to receive the most benefits, including:
high-ranking military and representatives of law enforcement agencies participating in the ATO and interested in continuing hostilities because of the desire to cash in on the supply of troops;
nationalist-minded deputies and candidates for deputies, rushing to the Rada, who play on the feelings of a poorly educated electorate, an example of this is Oleg Lyashko;
oligarchs, a prominent representative of which is the head of the Dnipropetrovsk region, billionaire Igor Kolomoisky, one of the most powerful leaders of the “party of war”. The war and the escalation of tension allow the oligarchs of Ukraine to actively redistribute the property that belonged to the clan of the “Donetsk group”, which was unfriendly to them, to which the former President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych belonged.
Over the long months of bloody confrontation in eastern Ukraine, the oligarchic circles, represented by Igor Kolomoisky and others, have taken strong positions and are striving to strengthen them.
One of the tasks of the "party of war" is to stop the advance of social protests further, deep into Ukraine. The main goal is to make money. Many oligarchs have their own economic interests in the military sphere.
Donetsk Oblast, the most industrialized region of Ukraine and a donor to its budget for 20 years, is dominated by assets belonging to the Donetsk oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, who until recently was called the “master of Donbass” (see map in Fig. 7). Whoever can quickly seize assets in the Donbas and Lugansk region will be the true master of these regions.
Igor Kolomoisky said that “the state today is simply obliged to confiscate property, factories, shares of separatist supporters. All those who financed and continue to finance terror in the country.” This is the announcement of the main tasks of Igor Kolomoisky.
As you know, and this is emphasized in the article “How the “master of Donbass” Rinat Akhmetov does business in war conditions”, published in the RBC magazine in October 2014, Dnepropetrovsk governor and billionaire Igor Kolomoisky published on his Facebook page an appeal to “confiscate property supporters of separatism.

Rice. 7. The largest assets of R. Akhmetov in the regions of hostilities as of September 3, 2014

Kolomoisky proposes to transfer the confiscated property to a special OJSC, in which the participants of the ATO, veterans, relatives of the victims will be shareholders: “Why should some die for their country, while others continue to live?”, said the governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region.
According to Forbes, thanks to Kolomoisky's financial support, the region created four of its own armed formations: two special forces battalions Dnepr-1 and Dnepr-2, as well as two territorial defense battalions. Volunteers are paid from $1260 per month. For comparison: the average salary in Ukraine is $ 272 (according to the State Statistics Service of Ukraine for April 2014), about the same is received by an ordinary contract soldier serving in the Armed Forces.

Even their opponents speak respectfully of Kolomoisky's fighters. “I would not call them [Dnepr] a gang. They can be called a private army. They do not hesitate to advertise their affiliation. They are well armed. They are the most organized, the most motivated and the most aggressive” (from an interview with Forbes by Roman Lyagin, Chairman of the CEC of the Donetsk People’s Republic on 05/27/2014). Former DPR Prime Minister Alexander Borodai claimed that the republic "is in a state of war with Kolomoisky's group and troops." It was these troops that played an important psychological role: at the very beginning of the ATO, when the Ukrainian army was falling apart before our eyes, the Dnepr battalion looked like the only real force opposing the DPR.

In 2014, Kolomoisky played a win-win game: he was the first to start creating volunteer battalions, promised rewards for the heads of the separatists, began to persecute them in his area, called V. Putin a “small schizophrenic” and in just a couple of months, in the eyes of the townsfolk, he turned into the main a defender of Ukraine who can now afford to make accusations against other oligarchs and offer to expropriate their property. For comparison: the oligarch Sergei Taruta, who was appointed simultaneously with Kolomoisky, who got the problematic Donetsk region, did not prove himself in any way. He did not assemble his battalion, did not declare war on the separatists, did not place a bounty on the head of DPR field commander Alexander Mozhaev, known by the nickname Babai. As a result, Taruta was dismissed. The longer the ATO drags on, the more Ukrainians are disappointed in the new President, the more Kolomoisky's influence grows. The war party needs war. The longer it lasts, the more political and material dividends the party leaders receive.

The activities of Igor Kolomoisky on the day of the death of the Boeing 777 and in the days preceding it should be the subject of the closest attention. This was stated by Deputy Speaker of the State Duma, Secretary of the General Council of United Russia Sergei Neverov: “In connection with the death of the Malaysian aircraft, it is advisable to recall the fact that the oligarch Igor Kolomoisky owns a number of Ukrainian airlines: Ukraine International Airlines, Dniproavia, Aerosvit” , but what is even more interesting, and the activities of the dispatch services of Dnepropetrovsk, responsible for the wiring, are fully funded tragic flight, as well as, to a large extent, the technical support of dispatch services throughout Ukraine,” he said.

In October 2014, an independent Dutch political party applied to the International Criminal Court in The Hague to initiate criminal proceedings against Kolomoisky.

9.2.2. Another beneficiary is the North Atlantic Alliance (NATO), for whose leadership, both former Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and his successor Jens Stoltenberg, the death of a Boeing 777 was one of the reasons for the policy of "NATO expansion to the East." In an interview with the French publication Midi Libre, Rasmussen called the July 17 plane crash in eastern Ukraine a human tragedy that is also a war crime, and said the alliance had ample evidence that Russian-backed separatists were to blame. However, NATO leaders prefer to shy away from providing facts to support their ambitious claims.

9.2.3 The main beneficiary of the aftermath of the downing of the Boeing 777 was the Obama administration, which influenced the position of the heads of European states and the European Union to apply new sanctions against Russia, the introduction of which had been stalled for several months. On July 26, Barack Obama told CNBC: “It is regrettable that the downing of a Malaysian Airlines plane, which was quite possibly shot down by representatives of non-state actors who received extremely powerful weapons from the Russian government, could lead to the fact that our European partners will toughen their position.”

As you know, both Russia and the EU countries suffered from economic sanctions.

The main result of the death of Boeing was a change in attitude towards Russia as an outcast on the world stage and further isolation of the country from the world community. On the other hand, the Ukrainian side tacitly demanded protection from such an “aggressive” neighbor, so the EU and the US accelerated its integration into the Western space.

On October 6, 2014, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov commented on the recent statements by US Vice President Joe Biden that the United States "forced the European Union against its will and to the detriment of its economic interests to take the main blow anti-Russian sanctions". According to Lavrov, the US Vice President thus "confirmed the position that was outlined in a telephone conversation between Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to Kiev Jeff Pyatt in January of this year, when they discussed the role of the European Union in efforts to promote Western interests in Ukraine."

The technology that the United States successfully uses in such cases is network and non-contact wars that ensure the capture of territory, the establishment of control over it without the use of conventional, classical weapons, and, if possible, without direct military aggression at all. A similar scenario was played out by American intelligence services with a South Korean Boeing shot down by a Soviet fighter in 1983. At that time, this increased the isolation of the USSR from the world community and contributed to the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a single state.

According to experts from the RSI analytical group, the main beneficiary of the death of the Boeing 777 is the Anglo-Saxon world: the USA and Great Britain.
In this case, the benefit of the United States has already been received, regardless of what results the commission of inquiry comes to. The benefit lies in the economic pressure on the Russian Federation and on European countries that feel Russian economic sanctions in response. As a result of the weakening of the economic potential of Russia and European countries, the creation of another hotbed of tension in Europe, the United States is increasing its influence on the world community.

10. Forecast of the development of the situation associated with the death of the Boeing 777

The death of the Boeing 777 undoubtedly raised many questions for experts. A balanced analysis of a situation can only arise as a result of a long time of working on it. In this regard, it was surprising to hear the hasty judgments of Western officials about the causes of the death of Boeing in the first hours after the disaster. On September 27, 2014, Sergey Lavrov stated at the UN that a thorough and independent investigation into the circumstances of the death of the Malaysian airliner over Ukrainian territory is being delayed contrary to UN Security Council Resolution 2166. Such dragging plays into the hands of the western side – according to the western rhetoric, Russia tacitly continues to be the main culprit in this story. Specialists of the international commission have begun to prepare the final report, which will be published within a year from the moment of the disaster. A working version of the final report will be sent to representatives of the countries participating in the investigation (Australia, UK, Malaysia, Russia, USA and Ukraine). Within two months, the countries will have to give their opinions, which, if necessary, will be included in the final report.

Representative of the Russian Permanent Mission to the UN Alexei Zaitsev, speaking on 10/22/2014 at a meeting of the 4th Committee of the UN General Assembly, said that the Russian Federation was forced to state that the investigation into the Boeing 777 crash in Ukraine on July 17 had been stopped. According to him, it "virtually stalled."
According to the experts of the RCI analytical group, until the end of the work of the international commission and the publication of the final report, which will have to name the true culprits of the Boeing 777 crash, the geopolitical situation will be characterized, on the one hand, by the strengthening of sectoral sanctions against Russia, forcing it to give up its rights to Crimea and Sevastopol voluntarily part of Russia, and on the other hand, providing all kinds of support (including financial and military) to the Kiev government in order to involve Ukraine in the orbit of Anglo-Saxon geopolitical interests and draw it into NATO, albeit in the rank of a partner for the time being, the deployment of Western troops and weapons on its territory countries.

11. Final conclusions

11.1. Prior to the death of the Boeing 777, information about the situation in Ukraine was on the front pages of the international media. The Ukrainian authorities suffered military and political defeat due to the lack of military successes and the inability to suppress the resistance of the DPR and LPR militias, Western countries were increasingly delayed in making important decisions on the Ukrainian conflict.

Financial and military-technical assistance to Ukraine was delayed, and prospects for receiving it on difficult conditions began to gradually form.
The death of the Boeing 777 and the blaming of responsibility for it on the DPR and Russia were a powerful informational occasion for a new round of escalation of the conflict and a reason for Ukraine to turn to Western assistance.

11.2. The death of the Boeing 777 is a planned military-political action. It was no coincidence that the choice of the aircraft fell on Malaysian Airlines, on Malaysia - a country located far from the scene of the accident, weak in military and political terms, unable to defend its interests. A country that not so long ago ceased to be a colony of Great Britain (1957) and is still under its huge influence.
The investigation into the downing of the Boeing 777 differs significantly in all respects from similar investigations that have taken place in the past.
The death of the Boeing 777 contributed to the introduction of sectoral sanctions against the Russian Federation and the creation in the international information space of the image of Russia and its leader as accomplices of terrorism.

11.3. The situation with the death of the Boeing 777 led to the creation of an information curtain that diverts attention from the actions of the Ukrainian oligarchy, primarily Igor Kolomoisky, to seize and redistribute property in the South-East of Ukraine.

The direct legal responsibility for the death of Boeing, according to the experts of the analytical group, is borne by the top leaders of the ATO.

1.4. The death of the Boeing 777 was not just a tragedy, but a planned action of a geopolitical nature that fits into the general concept of the US administration's policy, the goal of which is to achieve a unipolar world and escalate aggression against the Russian Federation, reduce its economic potential, stop the growth of its influence in the world.

12.1. The International Investigating Commission to take into account the issues and implement the recommendations presented by the Russian side (see Annex 1) in order to ensure a thorough international, transparent, accountable investigation in the context of a complete cessation of hostilities in the area of ​​the Boeing 777 downing.

12.2. Malaysian Airlines to file a claim for financial and reputational damages against the country in whose airspace the Boeing 777 was killed.

12.3. Relatives of persons from among the crew and passengers of the Boeing 777 who died as a result of the disaster should file claims against the country in whose airspace the Boeing 777 was killed, in the same way as some citizens of Germany did.

12.4. Aviation companies and other carriers using rail, sea and land communications should refrain from transit routes through the territory of Ukraine until the complete cessation of hostilities. Otherwise, not only the death of personnel and passengers and the destruction of property and cargo is possible, but also the lack of conditions for a full and objective investigation of a possible incident.
Declare the territory of Ukraine and the airspace above it as a zone unsafe for passenger and cargo transit traffic.

Application:

1. Issues to be studied for further investigation of the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 crash (Deputy Head of the Federal Air Transport Agency, authorized representative of the Russian Federation to participate in the investigation of the circumstances and causes of the Malaysia Airlines Boeing-777 crash, Oleg Storchevoi).

 
Annex 1
Issues to be explored for further investigation of Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 crash
On September 25, 2014, Oleg Storchevoi, Deputy Head of the Federal Air Transport Agency, authorized representative of the Russian Federation to participate in the investigation into the circumstances and causes of the Malaysian Airlines Boeing-777 crash, sent a letter to the International Commission of Investigation with a list of outstanding issues that need to be clarified in during further investigation.
Steps to take first:
1. The laying out of aircraft structural elements, analysis of damage to aircraft parts and possible sources of their origin is a generally accepted and mandatory element of the investigation;
2. Search for damaging elements at the crash site, in aircraft parts, seat upholstery, etc.;
3. Pathological and anatomical examinations of dead passengers and crew members, including for the presence of damaging elements and other foreign bodies and substances;
4. Studying data from Ukrainian ground-based radar facilities, including military ones, including data from primary radars, on the movement of an aircraft, starting from its entry into the airspace of Ukraine;
5. The study of the crew's conversations inside the cockpit according to the records of the internal microphone;
6. The study of radio and telephone conversations dispatchers of the Dnepropetrovsk ATC center:
- with the “military sector” or air defense forces of Ukraine;
- with the crews of flights SIA-351 (Singapore) and AIC-113 (India);
- other negotiations within the control room;
7. Receipt and analysis of information on flights of military aircraft in the area of ​​armed conflict in the east of Ukraine and at the site of the aircraft crash;
8. Receipt, analysis and verification of information from the Ukrainian side on planned and completed missile launches (both for training (including simulated launch) and for combat purposes), including the locations of the respective forces and assets;
9. Obtaining and analyzing information about the actual presence and consumption of anti-aircraft guided missiles, all anti-aircraft missile systems in service with the armed forces of Ukraine;
10. Obtaining and analyzing data from other countries participating in the investigation on the radar situation in the region (for example, data from US satellites, NATO surveillance systems (AWACS reconnaissance aircraft) and the Russian Federation).
In addition, you need to study the following data:
Regarding the analysis of the air situation:
11. Recordings of conversations between Ukrainian air traffic services authorities and aircraft crews and adjacent air traffic control posts;
12. Negotiations between pilots of military aircraft with the military sector and among themselves in the area of ​​armed conflict and the crash site;
13. Daily flight plan of the Ukrainian military aviation for 07/17/2014;
14. Data from the means of objective control of military aircraft located in the area;
15. Information on the instructions received by the air traffic management authorities of Ukraine from the aviation administration of Ukraine in connection with restrictions on the use of airspace (NOTAM publication) in the areas of Donetsk and Luhansk, as well as on the established procedures for interaction with aircraft crews and air defense authorities of Ukraine;
16. Evidence from the crews of aircraft flying on the day of the crash in a similar area about possible interference in the operation of on-board and ground navigation equipment;
Regarding the radar situation:
17. Information on the composition and performance of Ukrainian ground-based radar facilities;
18. Information about the control of the use of airspace in the given area by the air defense forces of Ukraine, if such control was carried out, including negotiations between air defense points;
19. Information about the radar tracking of aircraft on 17.07.2014 in the area of ​​the plane crash and the locations of the relevant units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces;
20. Analysis of data previously submitted by the Russian Ministry of Defense on the activation of radar centers in the period close to the time of the air crash;
In terms of flight and aircraft preparation:
21. Information on the preparation of the aircraft crew for the flight (including information on whether the crew has information about valid NOTAMs, about the level at which the flight was planned to be performed, as well as the reasons for possible changes in the flight plan). In addition, the planning of this flight by the Malaysian side should be studied, including statistical data on previous flights along the air route of flight MH17;
22. Information about previous failures and malfunctions, open points MEL (shortage or malfunction of any equipment from the list of minimum necessary), especially in terms of navigation equipment;
23. Information on the organization of aviation security during the preparation and performance of this flight (screening of passengers, baggage and cargo; the presence of dangerous or prohibited cargo).
Regarding the study of flight recorders:
24. It is required to complete the analysis of DFDR (Digital Flight Data Recorder) and CVR (Voice Data Recorder) data, paying special attention to the performance of navigation equipment and trajectory parameters.

ctrl Enter

Noticed osh s bku Highlight text and click Ctrl+Enter

British virtual tracker Ian Wilson is a video engineer by profession. An airplane-like object he discovered using the resource Google Maps. I saw him lying in the hard-to-reach jungles of Cambodia.

Jan has no doubt: the object is the plane - most likely the same one - the Malaysian Boeing 777-200, which on March 8, 2014, following from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, disappeared in the most mysterious way along with 239 passengers.

According to the outlines, the discovered liner is what you need. Only almost 6 meters longer - not 63.7 meters, but 70.

The tail fell off, - explains the tracker, - lies a little further from the fuselage. Hence the "elongation".

The main objection of skeptics is that the photograph from space used by Google Maps could have been accidentally taken by a plane flying over the jungle. In addition, four years have passed since the loss, it is quite enough for the lush tropical vegetation to completely hide the liner. And it's strange that the car in the photo is almost intact. Even if the plane did not crash from a great height, but tried to land in the jungle, it would most likely fall apart into several large fragments.

No, Wilson dismisses doubts. Like, I checked it using one of the resource options - “escape ground view”. The plane is down.

Could the virtual pathfinder "stumble" not on the MH370, but on some other Boeing 777-200?. Excluded - no other such in this area of ​​Cambodia fell. At least aviation experts know nothing about such disasters.

Wilson said that he would like to get to the crash site he discovered. After all, Malaysian and Australian experts, who, albeit to no avail, but officially are busy searching for the remains of the liner, as a rule, do not respond to the “signals” of virtual pathfinders. Or brush them aside.

BY THE WAY

And then there's Boeing

Competing with Wilson is Australian Peter McMahon, who has long been passionate about air crash investigations. Using Google Maps, he also saw the silhouette of a crashed Malaysian Boeing. But in another place - under water. If he gets to him, then he will have to dive.

In March 2018, McMahon: The Boeing lies in shallow water about 16 kilometers south of Round Island - one of the Seychelles. The satellite photo shows both the wings and the fuselage.

The Australian Transport and Safety Bureau told McMahon that the plane he discovered could very well be the one he was looking for. But no action was taken. The Malaysian authorities also responded. But more harshly: they asked not to mislead people.

McMahon somehow saw that the fuselage of the liner was full of holes. As if stitched with machine-gun bursts.

And one more

In 2016, a Malaysian Boeing found Scott Waring, a well-known ufologist and virtual archaeologist among those who look for anomalies in images transmitted from other planets, such as Mars.

Scott assures that he did not specifically search for the missing liner. I was looking for traces of UFOs that were seen in the Cape of Good Hope area in 2013. And for this purpose, I looked at the pictures of the area posted on Google Earth. I saw the outline of the plane. He lies under water. Almost whole.

Yes friends! The crash of the Malaysian airliner flying flight MN-17 was faked!!!

This terrible VIDEO was filmed by a female eyewitness, who was at the site of the so-called plane crash after 20 minutes. This is the main thing proof of the fake crash of the Malaysian Boeing 777.

Judge for yourself! Almost 300 dead is one and a half tons of human blood! And there were no traces of her anywhere, only a bird's, from dead birds.

A large number of phones and tablets were found at the site of the tragedy, and when checking them, it turned out that absolutely everyone had the last information recorded in their memory dated 2013!

A large number of suitcases were found at the site of the tragedy, in which there were not summer clothes, but winter ones, while the plane crash happened on July 17, 2014, and these people did not fly to the North Pole.

At the site of the tragedy, according to many eyewitnesses, already in the first hours and even minutes there was a terrible smell of the morgue, and among all the smells the smell of formalin prevailed.
...
There are big doubts that it was crash Boeing-777-200.

The fact is that the Boeing 777 series 200ER jet engines have turbines, the outer diameter of which significantly exceeds the average height of a person. And those broken engines that all the world's media showed us from the alleged crash site of the Boeing 777 are less than a person's height. The diameter of the turbines of the engine of the liner that crashed in Ukraine can be judged from this picture.

The Boeing 777 Series 200 LR has the largest engines in the world. Their diameter exceeds 3 meters!

But even this is not what initially confuses so many people.

The heavy multi-ton engines of an aircraft that fell from the sky lie on the ground as if they were carefully placed there.

This is what Boeing 777 engines usually look like on the ground when the plane crashes. These are shots from the foreign chronicle of air crashes. We see that the engines of the crashed planes have practically gone underground.

We all studied physics at school and must remember the formula:

(The energy of a body is equal to the mass divided by two and multiplied by the square of the speed).

Boeing 777 engines have a large mass concentrated in a small volume. Due to this, when falling vertically to the ground (or when an aircraft falls at a large angle), they tend to make holes in any soil with their large mass and make indentations in it.

Below is our case, Ukraine. When viewing this picture, there is a persistent feeling of deception.

As eyewitnesses say, this scrap metal lies on the surface of the earth as if it had been poured out of a dump truck! Such a picture is possible during a plane crash, when the plane crashes during landing - horizontal movement along the surface of the earth.

In our case, there was an uncontrolled vertical fall of the aircraft destroyed in the sky, and craters-recesses from the heaviest fragments of the aircraft must have formed in the ground.

However, they are not!

This gloomy "picture" adds even more falsehood those formalin-smelling corpses without a single drop of blood, which were filmed on her tablet by a female eyewitness.

With such obvious facts in hand, I would like to say that the world community is faced with an unprecedented political scam!

The leadership of the United States and Ukraine tried to deceive the whole world in the most brazen way!

Personally, after comprehending all the facts, only one question arises in my head: how a moral freak must be in order to conceive and implement this multi-way monstrous scam?!

A lot has already been written on the Web about the downed Boeing-777 over Ukraine. Entire "sheets" covered with blogger gorojanin-iz-b and writer Yuri Mukhin. I considered it right for myself to apply in this publication "Occam's razor" - a methodological principle that sounds like this: "you should not attract new entities unless absolutely necessary". In other words, if a lie can be exposed by one or two obvious facts, then there is no need to bring dozens more facts or hypotheses. If the result has already been achieved, why fill the reader's head with unnecessary information.

I am sure that after reading this article, there will be a stupor and a lot of questions in the minds of many people. Chief among them: "is it possible to falsify???"

Friends! I assure you it is possible! And not like that!

After the half-fake Boston terrorist attack on April 15, 2013 in the United States, I already look at the world with different eyes.

This photo went around the world then!

Do you think it depicts a person injured in a terrorist attack?

Here and no! It's a legless actor involved in a huge scam! Details in the above article.

In 2013, a performance with a legless actor was needed so that this "sufferer" later pointed to the "perpetrators of the terrorist attack" - the Chechen brothers Tsarnaev.

The US administration really wanted to play the "Muslim card" then.

In 2014, the performance with the downed Malaysian Boeing-777 was needed by the same US administration in order to point the finger at Russia and call it the aggressor. Which was done immediately.

The American hawks need a big war for the sake of another redistribution of the world, their minds are "sharpened" for this.

Our task is to prevent their plans from being realized.